LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Hindi " the learned District Judge, Jub as such as from 16th June 1931, he bulpore, transferred it, on 7th January had no jurisdiction to decide the 1931, for disposal, apparently under appeal on the 26th idem when he S 24, Civil P C , to Mr Paranjpe, First had become an Additional Judge of the Class Subordinate Judge, Narsinghpur, Court of the District Judge, Hoshanga who was also the Additional Judge of bad It was therefore urged that the the Court of the District Judge, Jubbul judgment and decree under appeal being pore, as the Bevenue Sub division of ultra vires should be set aside and the Narsinghpore was then included in the first appeal remanded to the District Civil district of Jubbulpore Mr Par Judge, Jubbulpore, for rehearing and anjpe heard the arguments on the merits fresh disposal The appellants' learned of the appeal on 16th, 17th and 18th March counsel relied on JhcLfidu JSIclI v Pivthi 1931 and adjourned the case for delivery (l) in support of his contention of judgment to 8th April 1931 For one For the respondent reliance was placed reason or another the judgment was on Ramier v Mutkuhrishna Ayyar (2)1 2 however not delivered by him till 26th 1     2

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text †		Citation Index
Naraindas Hasrajmal v Saindad s/o Muhammad Hassan	[1944] AllINRprSind 44	All India Reporter - Sind	India	28 May 1943	AsianLII
Venkamamidi Balakrishnayya v Nannapaneni Linga Rao	[1942] AllINRprMad 245; [1943] AIR Mad 449	All India Reporter - Madras	India - Tamil Nadu	23 Nov 1942	AsianLII