LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

May "We are of opinion that the correct interpreta 1937, they were not presented on that date, proba tion to be placed upon the decree is that primarily bly because the applicant was not present and the it gives the decree-holders a decree for money for application for execution was accordingly consigned which the judgment-debtor is found liable, but to records It is clear, therefore, that the question of limitation was raised for the first time with the 1 ('42) 29 A I R 1942 Oudh 31     1

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Jagrup v Ram Sabad	[1941] AllINRprOudh 153; [1942] AIR Oudh 217	All India Reporter - Oudh	India - Uttar Pradesh	2 Oct 1941	AsianLII