LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Mainland Plumbing & Hardware) v Horn   flag 

[2022] PGNC 539
National Court of Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea
2nd December, 2022

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name †  Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
“ 35 The above principles in my respectful opinion affirm that the Court can in the exercise of its inherent power consider and determine abuse of process, an issue which both counsel have fully addressed in their respective submissions In my view, such an approach by the Court is in harmony with the view held in Application by Anderson Agiru (supra), where the Supreme Court stated among other things, that the Court can in the exercise of its inherent power summarily dismiss a proceeding which is an abuse of process In my respectful opinion, Lord Diplock stated this same principle in Hunters v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police (supra), which Hartshorn J referred to in NAE Ltd (supra) See also; Breckwoldt & Co (NG) Pty v Gnoyke [1974] PNGLR 106 Papua New Guinea circa 1974 PacLII flag 50
[1998] PNGLR 8 [1998] PNGLR 8 Papua New Guinea circa 1998 PacLII flag 160
and The State v Peter Painke [1976] PNGLR 210 Papua New Guinea circa 1976 PacLII flag 83
Michael Newell Wilson v Clement Kuburam [2016] SC 1489 United Kingdom - Scotland circa 2016 flag 6
PNG Forest Products and Inchcape Berhad v The State & Jack Genia, Minister for Forests [1972] PNGLR 85 Papua New Guinea circa 1972 PacLII flag 6
PNG Forest Products v State [1992] PNGLR 85 Papua New Guinea circa 1992 PacLII flag 170
Takori v Yagari [2008] SC 905 United Kingdom - Scotland circa 2008 flag 61
Types of abuses of process may vary from case to case but to establish an abuse of process there must be evidence showing that the processes of the court have been improperly used; or have been used for an improper purpose; or have been used in an improper way; or that such abuse of process have resulted in the right of the other party being denied, defeated or prejudiced: National Executive Council v Public Employees Association [1993] PNGLR 264 Papua New Guinea circa 1993 PacLII flag 75

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback