LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite

Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Interpretación prejudicial de los art culos 81 y 82 literal d) de la Decisión 344 de la Comisión del Acuerdo de Cartagena, solicitada por el Consejo de Estado de la República de Colombia, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Primera. Actor: COMPAÑIA QUIMICA BORDEN S.A. Marca: "DOMESTICO & etiqueta" (PROCESO Nº 71-IP-2002)   flag 

[2002] ACCJ 86
Court of Justice of the Andean Community
International
18th September, 2002

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name †  Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
Ubat v FwZnr 1 Equitable Lawyer 8 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 13
4 Equitable Lawyer 14 4 Equitable Lawyer 14 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 2
6 Equitable Lawyer 19 6 Equitable Lawyer 19 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 2
7 Equitable Lawyer 19 7 Equitable Lawyer 19 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 3

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback