LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Andhra Cements Ltd v Government of AP - WRIT APPEAL    

Legislation Cited

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s) †	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
(1998) 4 SCC 464	(1998) 4 SCC 464			circa 1998			1
(1998) 4 SCC 194	(1998) 4 SCC 194			circa 1998			1
Tota Ram v UP	(1997) 6 SCC 280			circa 1997			5
1991 2 JT 43	1991 2 JT 43			circa 1991			1
R v Huntingdon District Council; Ex parte Cowan	[1984] 1 All ER 58; [1984] 1 WLR 501		United Kingdom	circa 1984	LexisNexis		26
McInnes v Onslow-Fane	[1978] 3 All ER 211; [1978] 1 WLR 1520		United Kingdom	circa 1978	LexisNexis		130
Mohinder Singh Gill v Chief Election Commissioner	[1977] INSC 227; (1978) 1 SCC 405; 1978 3 SCR 272; AIR 1978 SC 851	Supreme Court of India	India	2 Dec 1977	LIIofIndia		278
British Oxygen Co Ltd v Minister of Technology	[1970] UKHL 4; [1971] AC 610; [1970] 3 All ER 165	House of Lords	United Kingdom	15 Jul 1970	BAILII		447
Ridge v Baldwin	[1963] UKHL 2; (1963) 1 QB 539; [1964] AC 40; [1963] 2 All ER 66; [1963] 2 WLR 935; 14 ACJ 699	House of Lords	United Kingdom	14 Mar 1963	BAILII		978
4 SCC 183	4 SCC 183			circa 1963			2
4 SCC 69	4 SCC 69						5
3 SCC 719	3 SCC 719			circa 1963			2
2 SCC 462	2 SCC 462			circa 1963			5
2 SCC 410	2 SCC 410			circa 1963			9
2 SCC 205	2 SCC 205			circa 1963			11
1 SCC 396	1 SCC 396			circa 1963			3
Air 1977 SC 161	AIR 1977 SC 161	Supreme Court of India	India	circa 1977			1
Supreme Court: "There is no rule of natural justice that at every stage a person is entitled to personal hearing (ii) An opportunity of hearing is not necessarily be of personal hearing; it can be by written representation iii) Whether hearing to be personal or by written representation, depends on facts of each case, though ordinarily it is the discretion of the authority iv) Solely on the ground that the order was made without affording an opportunity of personal hearing cannot be rendered to be invalid in exercise of power of judicial review, especially when a party is likely to be affected by a decision have an opportunity of making a representation (v) Personal hearing in every situation is not necessary and there can be compliance of requirements of the natural justice of hearing when a right to represent is given and the decision is made on consideration thereof (vi) When all the circumstances have been taken into account, non-giving of opportunity of personal hearing before the applications are rejected cannot be a sine qua non for validity or legality of an order (vii) Consideration of a representation is a sufficient compliance with the principle of natural justice (viii) The inherent principle of natural justice is an opportunity of hearing to be provided before an adverse order is passed The requirement stands complied with by affording an opportunity to a person concerned to present his case before the authority and it is left to the discretion of the quasi-judicial authority to decide whether personal hearing is necessary and quit essential in the facts and circumstances of a case 34In	AIR 1971 SC 862	Supreme Court of India	India	circa 1971			12
Travancore Rayons v Union of India	AIR 1971 SC 862	Supreme Court of India	India	circa 1971			4
Madhya Pradesh Industries Ltd v Union of India	[1965] INSC 154; [1966] 1 SCR 466; AIR 1966 SC 671	Supreme Court of India	India	16 Aug 1965	LIIofIndia		5
F N Roy v Collector of Customs, Calcutta	[1957] INSC 48; [1957] SCR 1151; AIR 1957 SC 648	Supreme Court of India	India	16 May 1957	LIIofIndia		1