LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

State v Dayal [2000] FJLawRp 50   flag 

[2000] 1 FLR 195
Federal Law Reports
Australia
6th September, 2000

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) †  Court Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
R v Hendon Justices [1994] QB 167 United Kingdom circa 1994 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 7
(1992) 156 JP 609 (1992) 156 JP 609 United Kingdom circa 1992 flag 2
R v Birmingham Justices ex parte Lamb [1983] 3 All ER 23 United Kingdom circa 1983 LexisNexis flag 16
Maxwell v Keun (1921) 1 KB 645 United Kingdom circa 1921 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 4
When granting an adjournment in these circumstances courts must be fair to both sides The defence because an accused is presumed innocent and entitled to have his case disposed of quickly The prosecution because as societies guardian they must protect the public interest by ensuring that properly brought prosecutions are concluded In R v Swansea, Justices and Davies, Ex-parte DPP 154 JP 709 United Kingdom flag 8

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback