|
Martinez v United States
|
333 F3d 1295
|
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
|
United States
|
17 Jun 2003
|
WorldLII
|
|
 21 
|
|
Hubbard v Administrator Environmental Protection Agency
|
982 F2d 531; 61 USLW 2345; 299 USApp DC 143
|
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
|
United States - District of Columbia
|
27 Nov 1992
|
WorldLII
|
|
19
|
|
Yee v United States
|
512 F2d 1383; 206 Ct Cl 388
|
|
United States
|
circa 1992
|
Westlaw
|
|
15
|
|
Kanemoto v Reno
|
41 F3d 641
|
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
|
United States
|
5 Dec 1994
|
WorldLII
|
|
13
|
|
James v Caldera
|
159 F3d 573
|
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
|
United States
|
24 Feb 1999
|
WorldLII
|
|
12
|
|
Randall v United States
|
95 F3d 339
|
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
|
United States
|
10 Sep 1996
|
WorldLII
|
|
12
|
|
10 USC 1163
|
10 USC 1163
|
United States Code
|
United States
|
circa 1996
|
LII (Cornell)
|
|
12
|
|
Benderson Development Co Inc v United States Postal Service
|
998 F2d 959
|
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
|
United States
|
8 Jul 1993
|
WorldLII
|
|
10
|
|
Ward v Brown
|
22 F3d 516
|
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
|
United States
|
2 May 1994
|
WorldLII
|
|
8
|
|
Wilson v United States
|
917 F2d 529
|
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
|
United States
|
17 Dec 1990
|
WorldLII
|
|
8
|
|
Ulmet v United States
|
822 F2d 1079
|
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
|
United States
|
30 Jun 1987
|
WorldLII
|
|
6
|
|
John Demontiney, D/b/a Earthwalker Engineering, Plaintiff-Appellant, v United States of America, on Behalf of Its Agency, the Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs; Chippewa Cree Tribe of Rocky Boy's Reservation, Defendants-Appellees
|
255 F3d 801
|
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
|
United States
|
16 Jul 2001
|
WorldLII
|
|
5
|
|
Ponder v United States
|
117 F3d 549
|
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
|
United States
|
4 Sep 1997
|
WorldLII
|
|
5
|
|
Ulmet v United States
|
888 F2d 1028
|
|
United States
|
circa 1997
|
Westlaw
|
|
4
|
|
Walsh v United States
|
43 Ct Cl 225
|
|
United States
|
circa 1997
|
|
|
4
|
|
Casey v United States
|
8 Cl Ct 234
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Town of Sanford v United States
|
140 F3d 20
|
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
|
United States
|
31 Mar 1998
|
WorldLII
|
|
3
|
|
Conrad v United States
|
32 Ct Cl 139
|
|
United States
|
circa 1998
|
|
|
3
|
|
Gant v United States
|
18 Cl Ct 442
|
|
United States
|
circa 1998
|
|
|
3
|
|
Murphy v United States
|
16 Cl Ct 385
|
|
United States
|
circa 1998
|
|
|
3
|
|
Straughan v United States
|
1 Ct Cl 324
|
|
United States
|
circa 1998
|
|
|
3
|
|
Kansas City Power & Light Co, Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc , and Kansas Gas and Electric Co), Plaintiffs-Appellees, v United States, Department of Energy, Department of Energy As Successor To the United States Atomic Energy Commission, and Energy Research and Development Administration, Defendants-Appellants
|
234 F3d 642
|
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
|
United States
|
5 Dec 2000
|
WorldLII
|
|
2
|
|
Massachusetts v Heckler
|
616 FSupp 687
|
|
United States
|
circa 2000
|
Westlaw
|
|
2
|
|
Burd v United States
|
19 Cl Ct 515
|
|
United States
|
circa 2000
|
|
|
2
|
|
10 USC 8911
|
10 USC 8911
|
United States Code
|
United States
|
circa 2000
|
LII (Cornell)
|
|
2
|
|
Shelleman v United States
|
9 Cl Ct 452
|
|
United States
|
circa 2000
|
|
|
2
|
|
Hanson vs Wyatt
|
[2008] USCA10 648
|
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
|
United States
|
10 Sep 2008
|
WorldLII
|
|
|
|
Smith v Secretary of the Army
|
384 F3d 1288
|
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
|
United States
|
17 Sep 2004
|
WorldLII
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Edison Co of New York, Inc , New York Power Authority, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation, Arizona Public Service Corporation, Commonwealth Edison Co, Duke Energy Corporation, Entergy Gulf States, Inc , Florida Power Corporation, Florida Power and Light Co, Gpu Nuclear, Inc (on Behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light Co, Metropolitan Edison Co, and Pennsylvania Electric Co), Indiana Michigan Power Co, Nebraska Public Power District, Peco Energy Co, Southern California Edison Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc , System Fuels, Inc , Texas Utilities Electric Co, Virginia Electric & Power Co, Washington Public Power Supply System, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation, and Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (on Behalf of Kansas City Power & Light Co, Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc , and Kansas Gas and Electric Co), Plaintiffs-Appellees, v United States, Department of Energy, Department of Energy As Successor To the United States Atomic Energy Commission, and Energy Research and Development Administration, Defendants-Appellants
|
|
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
|
United States
|
3 May 2001
|
WorldLII
|
|
|
|
Mitchell v United States
|
[1993] USCAFED 542
|
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
|
United States
|
26 Jul 1993
|
WorldLII
|
|
|
