LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Public Prosecutor v Sheik Masoom    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
193 IC 825	193 IC 825		United Kingdom				3
Sub-Magistrate of " We hold that the District -Judge was wrong Narasaraopet for offences punishable under in dismissing the respondent's later applica S 380, Penal Code, so far as accused 1 and 2 tion as being barred by the law of limitation were concerned and for offences punishable and consequently we dismiss the appeal with under ss 410 and 411, Penal Code, so far as costs The case will be remanded to the trial accused 3 and 4 were concerned, in respect Court but in view of the fact that the pro of the same articles They were all tried perties admittedly are the same as the pro together and found guilty of the offences perties covered in the former petition, no with which they were charged; but as ac further inquiry is necessary The execution cused 1 was an old offender who had been will proceed on this basis convicted for an offence under the provi c r k /d s Appeal dismissed sions of Ch 17, Penal Code, there was also 1 ('40) 27			India - Tamil Nadu	circa 1940			2
[1940-1] MLJ 537	[1940-1] MLJ 537		Malaysia	circa 1940	LexisNexis		2
[1924] Mad 836	[1924] Mad 836		India	circa 1924			2
Air	AIR 1924 Mad 836		India - Tamil Nadu	circa 1924			1
80 IC 731	80 IC 731		United Kingdom	circa 1940			1
47 MLJ 4281	47 MLJ 4281		Malaysia	circa 1940	LexisNexis		1
47 MLJ 428	47 MLJ 428		Malaysia		LexisNexis		1
47 MLJ 47	47 MLJ 47		Malaysia		LexisNexis		1