LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index † | |
Air 1939 PC 80 |
|
Privy Council | India | circa 1939 |
|
||
Veluthandi Beerankutty v Ameth Mammu |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1939 |
|
|||
Air 1940 All 423 |
|
India - Uttar Pradesh | circa 1940 |
|
|||
[1938] Cal 25 |
|
United States - California | circa 1938 |
|
|||
(1937) LR 2 Cal 373 |
|
United States - California | circa 1937 |
|
|||
191 IC 616 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1939 |
|
|||
176 IC 212 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1939 |
|
|||
11 Own 1103 |
|
Canada - Ontario | circa 1939 |
|
|||
[1940] Australian Law Journal 439 |
|
Australian Law Journal | Australia | circa 1940 | Legal Online |
|
|
[1939] Own 3131 |
|
Canada - Ontario | circa 1939 |
|
|||
[1939] Own 313 |
|
Canada - Ontario | circa 1939 |
|
|||
Note "Amendment tion of the parties' liberty of contract with period ** reference to their rights and obligations (b) Provincial Small Cause Courts Act (1887), under the decree and that if they do contract S 25--Erroneous decision--Interference under section 25 upon terms which have reference to and An erroneous decision on a question of law consti affect the execution, discharge or satisfaction tutes no ground for interference under the exceptional of the decree, the provisions of s 47 involve powers conferred under S 25 unless substantial in that questions relating to such terms may justice has resulted [P 413c] fall to be determined by the executing Court Bam Nath -- for Applicant Following this view, it was held by the S N Srivastava -- for Opposite Party Allahabad High Court in A I R 1940 ALL, Order -- This is a judgment-debtor's 4233 4that the period of 12 years provided application in revision under s 25, Provin in s 48 should be computed from the date ce cial Small Cause Courts Act, from an order of the default mentioned in a compromise ^ passed by the Judge, Small Cause Court, decree which altered the original decree A dismissing his objection The objection was similar view was taken in A i r 1938 Gal made in the execution proceedings The ori 25,4 where an order of the Court embodying ginal decree was passed on 29th July 1924 the compromise passed subsequent to the Upon an application presented by the judg original decree was regarded in the nature ment-debtor it was amended on 23rd Novem 1 ('34) 21 | India - Uttar Pradesh | circa 1934 |
|
||||
209 IC 631 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1934 |
|
|||
151 IC 541 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1934 |
|
|||
65 CLJ 403 |
|
circa 1934 |
|
||||
11 Own 11031 |
|
Canada - Ontario | circa 1934 |
|
|||
[1943] Own 313 |
|
Canada - Ontario | circa 1943 |
|