|
Sub-Magistrate of " We hold that the District -Judge was wrong Narasaraopet for offences punishable under in dismissing the respondent's later applica S 380, Penal Code, so far as accused 1 and 2 tion as being barred by the law of limitation were concerned and for offences punishable and consequently we dismiss the appeal with under ss 410 and 411, Penal Code, so far as costs The case will be remanded to the trial accused 3 and 4 were concerned, in respect Court but in view of the fact that the pro of the same articles They were all tried perties admittedly are the same as the pro together and found guilty of the offences perties covered in the former petition, no with which they were charged; but as ac further inquiry is necessary The execution cused 1 was an old offender who had been will proceed on this basis convicted for an offence under the provi c r k /d s Appeal dismissed sions of Ch 17, Penal Code, there was also 1 ('40) 27
|
|
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
circa 1940
|
|
|
 2
|
