Registration Act " The more detailed judgment of Sharfuddin, J , is to the same effect In coming to the conclusion that this appeal must be dis missed, their Lordships' judgment rests on the view that none of the parties ever intended that the 1 -cowri share in mouzah Kolhua should vest in Udit or should pass by the mortgage from him to the mortgagee This case differs toto ccdo from the case suggested in argument of a mere failure to make a good title to property dealt with by the instrument, and which both parties had intended should form part of the security On the view of the facts taken in the High Court and by their Lordships, this case falls within the decision of this Board in the case of Harendra Lai Roy Chowdhuri v Hari Dasi Debi
|
LR 41 LA 110
|
|
|
circa 1914
|
|
|
2
|