LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Family Property Law and the Three Fundamental Propositions in Stanford v Stanford     16

Cases Referring to this Journal Article

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
Todd & Todd	[2014] FamCA 101	Family Court of Australia	Australia	27 Feb 2014	AustLII		7
Malave & Ratcliffe	[2015] FCCA 201	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	5 Feb 2015	AustLII		5
Wang & Gao	[2015] FCCA 1861	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	7 Jul 2015	AustLII		1
Jackson & O ’ Shea	[2014] FamCA 72	Family Court of Australia	Australia	12 Feb 2014	AustLII		1
Suman v Suman	[2013] FCCA 434	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	6 Jun 2013	AustLII		1
Charlton & Charlton	[2016] FCCA 1846	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	21 Jul 2016	AustLII
Milic & Lynch	[2014] FCCA 2762	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	28 Nov 2014	AustLII
Boyle & Boyle	[2014] FCCA 2576	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	21 Nov 2014	AustLII
Ritter & Ritter	[2014] FCCA 2640	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	20 Nov 2014	AustLII
Herbert & Borden	[2014] FCCA 2323	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	13 Oct 2014	AustLII
Kern & Kern	[2014] FCCA 1108	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	30 May 2014	AustLII
Poole & Poole	[2014] FCCA 757	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	17 Apr 2014	AustLII
Delong & Delong	[2013] FCCA 2102	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	13 Dec 2013	AustLII
Marriner & Marriner	[2013] FCCA 1765	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	7 Nov 2013	AustLII
Haggerty & Parry	[2013] FCCA 615	Federal Circuit Court of Australia	Australia	27 Jun 2013	AustLII

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article

Journal Article Title	Citation(s)	Author	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
"Family Property Division And The Principle Of Judicial Restraint"	(2018) 41 University of New South Wales Law Journal 380	Parkinson, Patrick	Australia	circa 2018	AustLII		1