Workmens Compensation (Amendment) Act 1980

	Home \| Databases \| WorldLII \| Search \| Feedback Kiribati Sessional Legislation

		Percentage of incapacity
Loss of two limbs	)	100
Loss of both feet	)
Loss of both hands or of all fingers and thumbs	)
Total loss of sight	)
Total paralysis	)
Injuries resulting in being bedridden permanently	)
Any other injury causing permanent total disablement	)
Loss of remaining eye by one-eyed workman	)
Loss of remaining arm by one-armed workman	)
Loss of remaining leg by one-legged workman	)
Loss of arm at shoulder		90
Loss of arm between elbow and shoulder		80
Loss of arm at elbow		70
Loss of arm between wrist and elbow		65
Loss of hand at wrist		60
Loss of four fingers and thumb or one hand		60
Loss of four fingers		35
Loss of thumb –
both phalanges		35
one phalanx		12
the pulp of the thumb		6
Loss of index finger –
three phalanges		10
two phalanges		8
one phalanx		4
pulp of an index finger		2

Loss of middle finger -
three phalanges		10
two phalanges		8
one phalanx		4
pulp of a middle finger		2

Loss of ring finger -
three phalanges		10
two phalanges		8
one phalanx		4
pulp of a ring finger		2

Loss of little finger —
three phalanges		10
two phalanges		8
one phalanx		4
pulp of a little finger		2

Loss of metacarpals –
first or second (additional)		3
third, fourth or fifth (additional)		2

Loss of leg above knee resulting in a stump		90
less than 6 inches long

Loss of leg above knee resulting in a stump
more than 6 inches long		70

Loss of leg below knee		45
Loss of foot		40
Loss of toes -
all of one foot		15
great, both phalanges		8
great, one phalanx		4
other than great, each part with some loss of bone		1

Loss of eye –
eye out		40
Loss of sight of eye		40
Loss of lens of eye		30
Loss of sight of, except perception of light		40

Loss of hearing -
both ears		70
one ear		30

Facial disfigurement –
Very severe		100
Severe		40
Moderate		20
Minor		5

Total loss of natural Permanent Teeth –
(1) Anterior Teeth –
Loss of 1, 2 or 3 teeth		4
Loss of 4, 5 or 6 teeth		5
Loss of 7 to 12 teeth		6
(2) Posterior Teeth –
Loss of 1 tooth		1
Loss of 2 to 5 teeth		2
Loss of 6 to 16 teeth		4

Total permanent loss of use of member shall be treated as loss of member.

The percentage of incapacity for ankylosis of any joint shall be reckoned as from twenty-five to one hundred per cent of the incapacity for loss of the part at that joint, according to whether the joint is ankylosed in a favourable or unfavourable position.

Where there is a loss of two or more parts of the hand, the percentage of incapacity shall not be more than for the whole hand.

Where there are two or more injuries, the sum of the percentages for such injuries may be increased, and where such injuries are to the hand, the following basis of computing the increase shall be adopted, namely:-

(a) where two digits have been injured, the sum total of the percentages shall be increased by twenty per centum of such sum total;

(b) where three digits have been injured, the sum total of the percentages shall be increased by thirty per centum of such sum total;

(c) where four digits have been injured, the sum total of the percentages shall be increased by forty per centum of such sum total.

A one-eyed workman who on entering employment has failed to disclose the fact that he is one-eyed, to his employer, shall, if he loses his remaining eye, be entitled to compensation in respect of a degree of disablement of forty per centum only.

For the purpose of this Schedule a "one-eyed workman" means a "workman who has lost the sight of one eye."."

This printed impression has been carefully examined by me with the Bill which passed the Maneaba ni Maungatabu on 10 December, 1980, and is found by me to be a true and correctly printed copy of the said Bill.

The traditional basis of compensation for injury under the Workmen's Compensation legislation is that the workman is compensated for having his capacity to work reduced by his injury. This means that purely disfiguring injuries such as severe scarring, which do not affect the workman's ability to work, are not subject to payment of compensation under the Ordinance. The workman will only be able to obtain compensation for such injuries if he can prove fault on the part of his employer in an action for damages, whereas under the Ordinance the workman is compensated for injuries which may even be entirely his own fault.

It is considered that the present Ordinance is too restrictive and that the category of injuries for which compensation is automatically payable should be widened. The Bill replaces the Schedule to the Ordinance and the new Schedule now includes:–

The opportunity has also been taken to increase the % of disability allocated to most of the Scheduled injuries.

I hereby certify my opinion that none of the provisions of the above Act conflict with the Constitution and that the Beretitenti may properly assent to the Act.

Kiribati Sessional Legislation

Workmens Compensation (Amendment) Act 1980