Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Fiji Legislation |
LAWS OF FIJI
CHAPTER 107
PRESS CORRECTION
Ordinances Nos. 3 of 1949, 38 of 1960
AN ACT
TO PROVIDE FOR THE CORRECTION OF FALSE AND DISTORTED STATEMENTS APPEARING IN THE
PRESS
[1st July, 1949.]
Short title
1.
This Act may be cited as the Press Correction Act.
Interpretation
2.
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires-
"newspaper" means any paper containing public news, intelligence or occurrences, or any remarks, observations or comment in relation to such news, intelligence or occurrences printed and published in Fiji periodically or in parts or numbers at intervals not exceeding thirty-one days between the publication of any two such papers, parts or numbers;
"proprietor of the newspaper" includes the following persons:-
(a) the owner of the newspaper;
(b) the editor of the newspaper;
(c) in the case of a newspaper owned by a body corporate, each director of such body corporate; and
(d) in the case of a newspaper owned by a partnership, each partner.
Power
of
Minister
to
correct
false
or
distorted
statements
published
in
a
newspaper
3.
If any article, item, report, letter or advertisement, (hereinafter called the
original article) is published in any newspaper which
in the opinion of the
Minister is false or distorted, he may by an order which shall be delivered at
the principal office of the
newspaper require to be published without charge in
an issue of the newspaper to be named and in as prominent a position and manner
as that in which the original article appeared a statement (hereinafter called
the correcting statement) containing the facts considered
by the Minister to be
true which shall be delivered with the
order:
Provided
that-
(a) the correcting statement as far as possible shall not contain more words than the original article and in no case shall contain more than double the number of words in the original article;
(b) the correcting statement shall be in the same language as the original article and shall not contain any comment or expression of opinion.
(Section amended by 38 of 1960, s. 2.)
Offence
4.
If the correcting statement is not published as required by a lawful order under
the provisions of section
3,
each proprietor of the newspaper shall, subject to the provisions of section
6,
be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine of two hundred
dollars or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding six
months or to both such
fine and imprisonment:
Provided
that where the person convicted is a body corporate, such person shall be liable
to a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars.
Order for publication by court on conviction
5.-(1)
A court on convicting a person under the provisions of section
4
may, in addition to any punishment it may award, make an order that the
correcting statement shall be published in the newspaper
in respect of which the
conviction has been obtained in an issue to be specified and in as prominent a
position and manner as that
in which the original article
appeared.
(2) If the correcting
statement is not published in accordance with an order made under the provisions
of subsection (1), the issue
in which such statement should have appeared and
each subsequent issue of the newspaper until such statement is published in the
manner ordered, save in so far as the order required publication in a specified
issue, shall be deemed to be a seditious publication.
Defences
6.
It shall be a good defence in a prosecution under the provisions of this Act to
prove or show to the satisfaction of the court-
(a) that the original article was true and not distorted; or
(b) that the correcting statement is not true; or
(c) that the correcting statement contains more words than are provided for in paragraph (a) of the proviso to section 3; or
(d) that the correcting statement contains comment or an expression of opinion; or
(e) that the correcting statement is not in the same language as the original article; or
(f) where the defendant is other than a body corporate-
(i) that the defendant endeavoured to the best of his ability to ensure publication of the correcting statement and that the non- publication was not due to his default; or
(ii) that the defendant was outside Fiji on the date of delivery of the order at the principal office of the newspaper and prior to the date upon which the correcting statement should have been published did not know and had no reason to believe that such order had been or might have been so delivered.
Controlled by Ministry of Information
------------------------------------------------
PacLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.paclii.org/consol_act/pca203