LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Sub-Committee on Judicial Accountability v Union of India |
1991 2 SCR Supl 1; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 29 Oct 1991 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Miller v Glasgow DC |
|
United Kingdom - Scotland | circa 1988 |
|
|||
Virji Ram Sutaria v Nathalal Premji Bhanvadia |
|
Supreme Court of India | India | circa 1970 |
|
||
Patna Zilla Brick Owners Association v Bihar |
|
India - Bihar | circa 1963 |
|
|||
Seth Bikhraj Jaipuria v Union of India |
[1961] INSC 228; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 24 Jul 1961 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Diamond Sugar Mills Ltd , Andanother v Uttar Pradesh Andanother |
[1960] INSC 292; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 13 Dec 1960 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
ND Thandani v Arnavaz Rustom Printer & Anr |
[1960] INSC 226; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 25 Nov 1960 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
U P v Manbodhan Lal Srivastava |
[1957] INSC 75; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 20 Sep 1957 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Bombay v R M D Chamarbaugwala |
[1957] INSC 33; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 9 Apr 1957 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Romesh Thappar v Madras |
[1950] INSC 16; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 26 May 1950 | LIIofIndia |
|
|
Re Kalyanam v Veerabhadrayya | India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1950 |
|
||||
March, '1968, the date of publication in the Gazette, and the Legislature was resummoned only thereafter The resummoning of the Legislature by the Governor was also a step in the right direction as it set up once again the democratic machinery which had been disturbed by the Speaker [490 A-E] (2) Under Art 174(2) there are no restrictions on the power of the Governor to prorogue The power being untrammeled and an emergency having arisen, there was no abuse of power by him nor can his motives be described as msla fide In fact it was the only reasonable method of getting rid of the adjournment and solving the political crisis The House, in fact, transacted other business showing that the prorogation and resummoning were considered valid After the prorogation there was no further curb on the legislative power of the Governor to promulgate the Ordinance [448 D, F-G; 490 E-F] Kalyanam v Veerabhadrayya | India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1950 |
|
||||
3 SCR 369 |
|
circa 1950 |
|
||||
1 SCR 275 |
|
circa 1950 |
|