LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Transfer of "Property Act, S 6--Right to But it seems to me that Shrawan must all recover money found due on taking accounts is along have known that he was not the ad not *a mere right to sue 1 opted son of Hiru, and as such had no A suit by the assignee for accounts and dis valid title to the field in suit And if he tribution of the shareis maintainable, the right partnership property of his assignor in the then plants trees on another person's land, to recover money which might be found due he cannot in my opinion demand compen on taking accounts not being a mere right to sation for the loss The two wells were sue within the meaning of S 6, but an action able claim which is capable of transfer und due on taking accounts from an agent, is not a mere right to sue within   flag  1

AIR 1924 Nag 146
All India Reporter, Nagpur Series
India - Maharashtra

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name Citation(s) Court †  Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
Shrinath v Kanhaiyalal [1923] AllINRprNag 127 All India Reporter - Nagpur India 3 Sep 1923 AsianLII flag

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback