Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Re Nickols's Appeal 3

Federal Law Reports

Australia

22nd August, 1963

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
Komljenovic v Chief of Navy	[2017] ADFDAT 4; (2017) 319 FLR 215	Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal	Australia	5 May 2017	AustLII		3
Bateson v Chief of Army	[2012] ADFDAT 3; (2012) 263 FLR 409	Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal	Australia	25 May 2012	AustLII		1

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title	Citation(s)	Author	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
"Do Members of the Armed Forces Have Any Rights in Their Employment?"	(1972-1973) 5 (2) Federal Law Review 200	Nettheim, Garth	Australia	circa 1973	AustLII

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
R v Roberts	[1942] 1 All ER 187; 28 Cr App R 102; 58 TLR 138		United Kingdom	circa 1942	LexisNexis		36
R v Letenock	(1917) 12 Cr App R 221		United Kingdom	circa 1917	LexisNexis		7
R v John Brown	[1730] EngR 105; 168 ER 177; (1730-1815) 1 Leach 148		United Kingdom	circa 1730	CommonLII		4
Komljenovic v Chief of Navy	[2017] ADFDAT 4; (2017) 319 FLR 215	Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal	Australia	5 May 2017	AustLII		3
Bateson v Chief of Army	[2012] ADFDAT 3; (2012) 263 FLR 409	Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal	Australia	25 May 2012	AustLII		1
"Do Members of the Armed Forces Have Any Rights in Their Employment?"	(1972-1973) 5 (2) Federal Law Review 200	Nettheim, Garth	Australia	circa 1973	AustLII

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback