Matching Cases: 9

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index †
Rahimtoola v Nizam of Hyderabad	[1958] AC 379; [1957] 3 All ER 441; [1957] 3 WLR 884		United Kingdom	circa 1957	LexisNexis / Westlaw		50
Public Prosecutions, Director of v Warren	[1993] AC 319; [1992] 4 All ER 865; [1992] 3 WLR 884		United Kingdom	circa 1992	LexisNexis / Westlaw		18
Whitehead v Whitehead (orse Vasbar)	[1962] 3 All ER 800; [1962] 3 WLR 884		United Kingdom	circa 1962	LexisNexis		6
Purcell v FC Trigell Ltd	1970 3 WLR 884		United Kingdom	circa 1970	LexisNexis / Westlaw		5
R v E Sussex County Council ex parte Tandy	[1997] 3 WLR 884		United Kingdom	circa 1997	LexisNexis / Westlaw		3
[1982] 3 WLR 884	[1982] 3 WLR 884		United Kingdom	circa 1982	LexisNexis / Westlaw		1
Re Shahid Iqbal	[1978] 3 WLR 884		United Kingdom	circa 1978	LexisNexis / Westlaw		1
Whitehead v Whitehead		"The authorities do establish one or two classes of nullity such as the following There may be others, though for my part I would be reluctant to see much extension of the classes (i) Proceedings which ought to have been served but have never come to the notice of the defendant at all This, of course, does not include cases of substituted service, or service by filing in default, or cases where service has properly been dispensed with: see, for example	United Kingdom	circa 1963	LexisNexis / Westlaw		1
Mountford v Scott		“ That tentative opinion by Lord Wright does not seem to me to be well founded If the law does not recognise a contract to enter into a contract (when there is a fundamental term yet to be agreed) it seems to me it cannot recognise a contract to negotiate The reason is because it is too uncertain to have any binding force No court could estimate the damages because no one can tell whether the negotiations would be successful or would fall through; or if successful, what the result would be It seems to me that a contract to negotiate, like a contract to enter into a contract, is not a contract known to the law We were referred to the recent decision of Brightman J about an option	United Kingdom	circa 1933	LexisNexis / Westlaw		1