LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Hanfstaengl v Empire Palace; Hanfstaengl v Newnes   flag  8

[1894] UKLawRpCh 102; [1894] 3 Ch 109
Court of Chancery
United Kingdom
11th June, 1894

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name Citation(s) Court †  Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
Hanfstaengl v W H Smith & Sons [1905] UKLawRpCh 26; (1905) 1 Ch 519 Court of Chancery United Kingdom 21 Feb 1905 CommonLII flag 1
TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Network Ten Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] FCAFC 53; (2005) 145 FCR 35; 216 ALR 631; 65 IPR 571; [2005] AIPC 92-099 Federal Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 26 May 2005 AustLII flag 17
Carter Holt Harvey Roofing Aluminium & Glass Group Ltd v Trevor Bills Ltd HC Auckland CP575/88 [1988] NZHC 1012; (1988) 2 TCLR 592 High Court of New Zealand New Zealand 13 Oct 1988 NZLII flag 2
British Leyland Motor Corporation v Armstrong Patents Co Ltd [1986] UKHL 7 House of Lords United Kingdom 27 Feb 1986 BAILII flag
Cie v La Patrie Publishing Co [1960] SCR 649 Supreme Court of Canada Canada 24 Jun 1960 Supreme Court of Canada flag
Hanfstaengl v Baines & Co [1894] UKLawRpAC 66; [1895] AC 20 United Kingdom 17 Dec 1894 CommonLII flag 27

Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title Citation(s) Author †  Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
"Panel Case and the Desirability of Harm as a Requirement of Copyright Liability, The" (2002) 7 Deakin Law Review 201 Ross, Jordon Australia circa 2002 AustLII flag
Tran, Anna Thuc-Anh --- "What is a 'Substancial Part'?: Digital samples: cut-and-pasting and section 14 of the Australian Copyright Act 1968" [1999] DigTechLawJl 1 (1999) 1 Digital Technology Law Journal 1 Tran, Anna Thuc-Anh Australia circa 1999 AustLII flag

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court †  Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
Gambart v Ball [1863] EngR 481; 14 CBNS 306; 32 LJCP 166; 143 ER 463 Court of Common Pleas United Kingdom circa 1863 CommonLII flag 10
14 CBNS 303 14 CBNS 303 Court of Common Pleas United Kingdom flag 1
14 CBNS 317 14 CBNS 317 Court of Common Pleas United Kingdom flag 1
Brown v North [1852] EngR 756; 8 Exch 1; 155 ER 1233 Court of Exchequer United Kingdom circa 1852 CommonLII flag 68
TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Network Ten Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] FCAFC 53; (2005) 145 FCR 35; 216 ALR 631; 65 IPR 571; [2005] AIPC 92-099 Federal Court of Australia Australia - Commonwealth 26 May 2005 AustLII flag 17
Carter Holt Harvey Roofing Aluminium & Glass Group Ltd v Trevor Bills Ltd HC Auckland CP575/88 [1988] NZHC 1012; (1988) 2 TCLR 592 High Court of New Zealand New Zealand 13 Oct 1988 NZLII flag 2
British Leyland Motor Corporation v Armstrong Patents Co Ltd [1986] UKHL 7 House of Lords United Kingdom 27 Feb 1986 BAILII flag
"Panel Case and the Desirability of Harm as a Requirement of Copyright Liability, The" (2002) 7 Deakin Law Review 201 Ross, Jordon Australia circa 2002 AustLII flag
Cie v La Patrie Publishing Co [1960] SCR 649 Supreme Court of Canada Canada 24 Jun 1960 Supreme Court of Canada flag
Tran, Anna Thuc-Anh --- "What is a 'Substancial Part'?: Digital samples: cut-and-pasting and section 14 of the Australian Copyright Act 1968" [1999] DigTechLawJl 1 (1999) 1 Digital Technology Law Journal 1 Tran, Anna Thuc-Anh Australia circa 1999 AustLII flag
3 AC 483 3 AC 483 United Kingdom circa 1999 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 8
Roworth v Wilkes [1807] EngR 455; 170 ER 889; (1807) 1 Camp 94 United Kingdom circa 1807 CommonLII flag 2
4 QB 715 4 QB 715 United Kingdom circa 1999 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 7
Hanfstaengl v Baines & Co [1894] UKLawRpAC 66; [1895] AC 20 United Kingdom 17 Dec 1894 CommonLII flag 27
Hanfstaengl Art Publishing Co v Holloway [1893] UKLawRpKQB 62; [1893] 2 QB 1 United Kingdom 19 Apr 1893 CommonLII flag 4
Scott v Stanford [1867] UKLawRpEq 23; 3 Eq 718 United Kingdom 7 Feb 1867 CommonLII flag 19
3 QB 387 3 QB 387 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 11
Smith, Hands v Andrews 2 CLI 1 5
31 LT 775 31 LT 775 United Kingdom flag 1
4 QB 722 4 QB 722 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 1
Tinsley v Lacy [1863] EngR 762; 1 H & M 747; 71 ER 327 United Kingdom circa 1863 CommonLII flag 3
3 QB 39 3 QB 39 United Kingdom LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 2
Dicks v Brooks [1880] UKLawRpCh 131; 15 Ch D 22 United Kingdom 4 May 1880 CommonLII flag 9

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback