LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index † | |
See, e g , In re Managed Care Litig |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
United States v Duarte-Acero |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
Fry v Board of Regents of the Univ of Wis Sys |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
NTN Bearing Corporation of Am v United States |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
Moffit See Bear MGC Cutlery Co v Estes Express Lines, Inc |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
Livestock Marketing Ass'n v United States Dep't of Agric |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
Suzawith v Green Bay Area Sch Dist |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
But see Prieto v John Hancock Mut Life Ins Co |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
United States v Bin Laden |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
Doe v Lee |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
(1997) 132 FSupp 2d 1150 |
|
United States | circa 1997 | Westlaw |
|
||
See Price v Multnomah County |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
132 FSupp 2d 1233 |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
University Books and Videos, Inc v Miami-Dade County |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
Landow v Sch Bd of Brevard County |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v United States Army Corps of Eng'rs |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
See Roche v Anderson |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
132 FSupp 2d 662 |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
Leggett & Platt, Inc v Hickory Springs Mfg |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
Oasis Corporation v Judd |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
See Rutherford v Lake Michigan Contractors, Inc |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
United States v Yates |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
Hyman v City of Louisville |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
See In re MasterCard Int'l Inc , Internet Gambling Litigation and Visa Int'l Serv Ass'n Internet Gambling Litigation |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
see West Virginia v United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs |
|
Secretary (together, "HHS") challenging, on Tenth Amendment grounds, 1 the constitutionality of amendments to the federal Medicaid program that require West Virginia to adopt a program to recover certain Medicaid expenditures from the estates of deceased Medicaid beneficiaries The district court granted summary judgment in favor of HHS | United States | Westlaw |
|
||
Armstrong Trust v United States |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
Tate Access Floors, Inc v Interface Architectural Res , Inc |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
DL Cromwell Inv , Inc v NASD Regulation, Inc |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
132 FSupp 2d 87 |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
Micare v Foster & Garbus |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
Id; see Gowens v Dyncorp |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|
|||
132 FSupp 2d 1 |
|
United States | Westlaw |
|