|
In Re Mirams
|
[1891] UKLawRpKQB 40; (1891) 1 QB 594
|
|
United Kingdom
|
28 Feb 1891
|
CommonLII
|
|
 13 
|
|
Anderson v Kemshead
|
[1852] EngR 931; 51 ER 806; (1852) 16 Beav 329
|
Rolls Court
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1852
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Between Thomas Carlisle, on behalf of himself and all other the Shareholders in The South-Eastern Railway Co, except the Defendants to this suit, Plaintiff: and The South-Eastern Railway Co, James Macgregor, James Renshaw, Robert Browne, Henry Lewis Smale, John Bradshaw, The Right Honourable James Byng, John Charles Jack, Daniel Warren, William Gordon Thomson, Robert William Kennard, Charles Ironside; and Francis Curwen Smith, Defendants
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1850
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Raincock v Young
|
[1849] EngR 502; 41 ER 1238; (1849) 1 Mac & G 196
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1849
|
CommonLII
|
|
1
|
|
In the Matter of Brookman, an alleged Lunatic
|
[1849] EngR 514; 41 ER 1239; (1849) 1 Mac & G 199
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1849
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Feistel v King's College, Cambridge
|
[1848] EngR 725; 50 ER 814; (1848) 11 Beav 254
|
Rolls Court
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1848
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Feistel v King's College, Cambridge
|
[1847] EngR 475
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1847
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
