"Concurrent Expert Evidence in US Toxic Harms Cases and Civil Cases More Generally: Is there a Proper Role for Hot Tubbing?"
|
(2017) 40 Houston Journal of International Law 1
|
Houston Journal of International Law
|
United States
|
circa 2017
|
HeinOnline / Westlaw
|
|
2
|
Britax Childcare Pty Ltd v Infa-Secure Pty Ltd (No 4)
|
[2015] FCA 651; (2015) 113 IPR 280
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
30 Jun 2015
|
AustLII
|
|
12
|
Matthews v SPI Electricity Pty Ltd (No 32)
|
[2013] VSC 630
|
Supreme Court of Victoria
|
Australia - Victoria
|
18 Nov 2013
|
AustLII
|
|
9
|
Matthews v SPI Electricity (Ruling
|
[2013] VSC 180
|
Supreme Court of Victoria
|
Australia - Victoria
|
18 Apr 2013
|
AustLII
|
|
9
|
"Using the "Hot Tub": How Concurrent Expert Evidence Aids Understanding Issues"
|
(2011) 10 Judicial Review 171
|
Judicial Review
|
Australia
|
circa 2011
|
HeinOnline / Informit
|
|
1
|
"The United States Deposition - Time for Adoption in Australian Civil Procedure?"
|
(2007) 31 Melbourne University Law Review 146
|
Melbourne University Law Review
|
Australia
|
circa 2007
|
AustLII
|
|
2
|
Fox v Percy
|
[2003] HCA 22; (2003) 214 CLR 118; (2003) 197 ALR 201; (2003) 77 ALJR 989; (2003) 38 MVR 1; (2003) 24 Leg Rep 2; (2003) 197 AR 201
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
circa 2003
|
AustLII
|
|
5047
|