LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court † | Jurisdiction | Date | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Naidoo v Matlala NO |
[2011] ZAGPPHC 165; |
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria | South Africa | 20 Sep 2011 | SAFLII |
|
|
Lodhi 2 Properties Investments CC v Bondev Developments (Pty) Ltd |
[2007] ZASCA 85; |
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa | South Africa | 1 Jun 2007 | SAFLII |
|
|
" An order or judgment is 'erroneously granted' when the Court commits an 'error' in the sense of 'a mistake in a matter of law appearing on the proceedings of a Court of record' (The Shorter Oxford Dictionary) It follows that a Court in deciding whether a judgment was 'erroneously granted' is, like a Court of Appeal, confined to the record of proceedings In contradistinction to relief in terms of Rule 31(2)(b) or under the common law, the applicant need not show 'good cause' in the sense of an explanation for his default and a bona fide defence (Hardroad (Pty) Ltd v Oribi Motors (Pty) Ltd (supra) at 578F-G; De Wet (2) at 777F-G; Tshabalala v Pierre | South Africa | circa 1979 | LexisNexis |
|
|||
Nyingwa v Moolman NO |
|
South Africa | circa 1993 | LexisNexis |
|
||
First National Bank of South Africa Ltd v Jurgens |
|
South Africa | circa 1993 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Schlesinger v Schlesinger |
|
South Africa | circa 1979 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Promedia Drukkers & Uitgewers (Edms) Bpk v Kaimowitz |
|
South Africa | circa 1996 | LexisNexis |
|
||
Bakoven Ltd v G J Howes (Pty) Ltd |
|
South Africa | circa 1992 | LexisNexis |
|
||
First National Bank of SA v Van Rensburg |
|
South Africa | circa 1994 | LexisNexis |
|