LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Some Comments on the Scheme of Arrangement as an "Affected Transaction" as Defined in the Companies Act 71 of 2008    

Legislation Cited

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text †		Citation Index
Ex parte Satbel (Pty) Ltd (Meyer intervening)	1987 3 SA 405		South Africa	circa 1987	LexisNexis		1
Ex parte NBSA Centre Ltd	1987 2 SA 783		South Africa	circa 1987	LexisNexis		6
Ex parte Satbel (Edms) Bpk: In re Meyer v Satbel (Edms) Bpk	1984 4 SA 347		South Africa	circa 1984	LexisNexis		4
Re National Bank Ltd	[1966] 1 All ER 1006; [1966] 1 WLR 819		United Kingdom	circa 1966	LexisNexis		72
Sefalana Employee Benefits Organisation v Haslam (553/97)	[2000] ZASCA 1; 2000 2 SA 415; [2000] JOL 6205	Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa	South Africa	3 Mar 2000	SAFLII		8
Namex (Edms) Bpk v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste (314/1992)	[1993] ZASCA 181; 1994 2 SA 265; [1994] 2 All SA 111	Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa	South Africa	26 Nov 1993	SAFLII		14
2010 Tsar 302	2010 TSAR 302		South Africa	circa 2010			1
2010 Tsar 302-304	2010 TSAR 302-304		South Africa	circa 2010			1
2010 Tsar 288-308	2010 TSAR 288-308		South Africa	circa 2010			1