LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Some Comments on the Scheme of Arrangement as an "Affected Transaction" as Defined in the Companies Act 71 of 2008    

Legislation Cited

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court †	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
Sefalana Employee Benefits Organisation v Haslam (553/97)	[2000] ZASCA 1; 2000 2 SA 415; [2000] JOL 6205	Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa	South Africa	3 Mar 2000	SAFLII		8
Namex (Edms) Bpk v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste (314/1992)	[1993] ZASCA 181; 1994 2 SA 265; [1994] 2 All SA 111	Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa	South Africa	26 Nov 1993	SAFLII		14
Ex parte Satbel (Edms) Bpk: In re Meyer v Satbel (Edms) Bpk	1984 4 SA 347		South Africa	circa 1984	LexisNexis		4
2010 Tsar 302	2010 TSAR 302		South Africa	circa 2010			1
Ex parte NBSA Centre Ltd	1987 2 SA 783		South Africa	circa 1987	LexisNexis		6
2010 Tsar 288-308	2010 TSAR 288-308		South Africa	circa 2010			1
Re National Bank Ltd	[1966] 1 All ER 1006; [1966] 1 WLR 819		United Kingdom	circa 1966	LexisNexis		72
2010 Tsar 302-304	2010 TSAR 302-304		South Africa	circa 2010			1
Ex parte Satbel (Pty) Ltd (Meyer intervening)	1987 3 SA 405		South Africa	circa 1987	LexisNexis		1