Intense Investments Ltd v Development Ventures Ltd
|
[2005] EWHC 1726 (TCC 26 The defendants argued that since the application for default judgment was not served on the 2ndand 3rd defendants the default judgment entered is irregular and therefore the defendants have the right to have it set aside 27 The defendants further rely on Order 1 rule 7 of the High Court Rules which provides for the practice and procedure of the English High Court to be followed where no express provision is made by the Fiji High Court Rules 28 However the plaintiffs opposed that and rely upon the case)
|
High Court of England and Wales
|
United Kingdom - England and Wales
|
circa 2005
|
BAILII
|
|
|
Kumari v Dass
|
[1999] FJCA 22
|
Court of Appeal of Fiji
|
Fiji
|
26 Feb 1999
|
PacLII
|
|
2
|
Alpine Bulk Transport Co Inc v Saudi Eagle Shipping Co Inc
|
[1986] 2 Lloyds Rep 221
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1986
|
Westlaw
|
|
159
|
Farden v Richter
|
[1889] UKLawRpKQB 79; (1889) 23 QBD 124
|
|
United Kingdom
|
9 May 1889
|
CommonLII
|
|
107
|