LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

"Using the "hot tub" How concurrent expert evidence aids understanding issues" (FCA)     1

Cases Referring to this Journal Article

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Williams & Enmore (No 2)	[2021] FamCA 340	Family Court of Australia	Australia	28 May 2021	AustLII		4

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Strong Wise Ltd v Esso Australia Resources Pty Ltd	[2010] FCA 240; (2010) 185 FCR 149; (2010) 267 ALR 259	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	18 Mar 2010	AustLII		17
"Dueling Scientific Experts: Is Australia’s Hot Tub Method a Viable Solution for the American Judiciary?"	(2009) 88 Oregon Law Review 311	Oregon Law Review	United States	circa 2009	HeinOnline / LexisNexis		1
"Secrets of the 'Hot Tub': Expert Witnesses, Concurrent Evidence and Judge-led Reform in Australia"	(2008) 27 Civil Justice Quarterly 51	Civil Justice Quarterly	United Kingdom	circa 2008	Westlaw		5
A/asian Performing Right Association Ltd v Monster Communications Pty Ltd	[2006] FCA 1806; (2006) 71 IPR 212	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	21 Dec 2006	AustLII		14
"Problems with expert evidence: are single or court-appointed experts the answer?"	(2006) 15 Journal of Judicial Administration 185	Journal of Judicial Administration	Australia	circa 2006	Legal Online		4
Ironhill Pty Ltd v Transgrid	[2004] NSWLEC 700; (2004) 139 LGERA 398	Land and Environment Court of New South Wales	Australia - New South Wales	15 Dec 2004	AustLII		7
"Recent Australian Development: A Response to Peter Heerey"	(2004) 23 Civil Justice Quarterly 388	Civil Justice Quarterly	United Kingdom	circa 2004	Westlaw		2
Visa International Service Association v Reserve Bank of Australia	[2003] FCA 977; (2003) 131 FCR 300	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	19 Sep 2003	AustLII		75
"R v AA Rouse"	(2003) 124 Victorian Bar News 55	Victorian Bar News	Australia - Victoria	circa 2003	Informit		3
Genetics Institute Inc v Kirin-Amgen Inc	[1999] FCA 742; (1999) 92 FCR 106; 163 ALR 761; 44 IPR 257; [1999] AIPC 39,577	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	7 Jun 1999	AustLII		161
Genetic Institute Inc v Kirin-Amgen Inc (No 2)	(1997) 78 FCR 368; 149 ALR 247; 39 IPR 155	Federal Court of Australia	Australia	circa 1997	Legal Online / Westlaw		19
"The changing face of litigation"	(1996) 6 Journal of Judicial Administration 179	Journal of Judicial Administration	Australia	circa 1996	Legal Online		1
"Practise note"	(1992) 66 Australian Law Journal 861	Australian Law Journal	Australia	circa 1992	Legal Online		2
Spika Trading Pty Ltd v Royal Insurance Australia Ltd	(1985) 3 ANZ Insurance Cases 60-663			circa 1985			7
Ancher, Mortlock, Murray & Woolley Pty Ltd v Hooker Homes Pty Ltd	(1971) 20 FLR 481; [1971] 2 NSWLR 278		Australia - New South Wales	circa 1971	Legal Online / Westlaw		149
Australia	[1927] AC 145		United Kingdom	circa 1927	LexisNexis / Westlaw		20
Koning Willem Ii (No 2)	[1907] UKLawRpPro 32; [1908] P 125		United Kingdom	24 Oct 1907	CommonLII		3
Gannet ' (Owners of the Steamship) v ' Algoa ' (Owners of the Steamship) , the 'Gannet'	[1900] UKLawRpAC 20; [1900] AC 234		United Kingdom	3 Apr 1900	CommonLII		3
Coghlan v Cumberland	[1898] UKLawRpCh 74; (1898) 1 Ch 704; 67 LJCh 402; 1 PD 283		United Kingdom	13 May 1898	CommonLII		139
Assyrian	(1890) 6 Asp Mar Law Cas 525		United Kingdom	circa 1890			2
Beryl	[1884] UKLawRpPro 38; 9 PD 137; 5 Asp Mar Law Cas 321		United Kingdom	18 Jun 1884	CommonLII		26
Aid, The	[1881] UKLawRpPro 14; (1881) 6 PD 84		United Kingdom	5 Mar 1881	CommonLII		2
Sir Robert Peel	(1880) 4 Asp Mar Law Cas 321		United Kingdom	circa 1880			7
Thorn v Worthing Skating Rink Co	(1877) 6 Ch D 415	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	circa 1877	LexisNexis / Westlaw		12
Alfred	(1850) 7 Nof Cas 352		United Kingdom	circa 1850			2