LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

HB Stockholdings Ltd v DCM Shriram Industries Ltd & Others - S 2011/2008   flag 

[2009] INDLHC 3374
High Court of Delhi
India
25th August, 2009

Legislation Cited

Legislation Name Provision
Companies Act, 1956 (Tas)

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court †  Jurisdiction Date Full Text Citation Index
Spices Valley Estate Ltd v TC For Express Ltd (2007) 3 Competition Law Journal 148 Competition Law Journal United Kingdom circa 2007 flag 1
Foss v Harbottle [1843] EngR 478; (1843) 2 Hare 461; 67 ER 189; 24 WR 293 Court of Chancery United Kingdom circa 1843 CommonLII flag 759
Ammonia Supplies Corporation (P) Ltd v Modern Plastic Containers Pvt Ltd AIR 1998 SC 3153 Supreme Court of India India circa 1998 flag 4
Hindustan Lever Employees' Union v Hindustan Lever Ltd AIR 1995 SC 470 Supreme Court of India India circa 1995 flag 2
LRs v Union of India AIR 1988 SC 752 Supreme Court of India India circa 1988 flag 5
Life Insurance Corporation of India v Escorts Ltd [1985] INSC 252; (1986) 1 SCC 264; 1985 2 SCALE 1289; 1985 3 SCR Supl 909; AIR 1986 SC 1370 Supreme Court of India India 19 Dec 1985 LIIofIndia flag 64
Dhulabhai v Madhya Pradesh & Anr [1968] INSC 93; [1968] 3 SCR 662; AIR 1969 SC 78 Supreme Court of India India 5 Apr 1968 LIIofIndia flag 90
Wasudhir Foundation v C Lal & Sons 45 DLT 556 India - Delhi circa 1986 flag 3
PSEB v Ashwani Kumar JT 1997 5 SC 182 United Kingdom - Scotland circa 1997 flag 3
Popat and Kotecha Property v State Bank of India Staff Assn (2005) 7 SCC 510 circa 2005 34
Hind Samachar Ltd v Indian Newspaper Society 119 DLT 570 India - Delhi circa 1986 flag 1
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd v Hindustan Unilever Ltd 151 DLT 650 India - Delhi circa 1986 flag 1
Act to "entertaining" the suit for the same relief as is sought before the CLB It is submitted that after the enactment of the Act and, in particular, Sections 397, 398 and 402 thereof the relief against oppression and mismanagement can no longer be termed as a common law right It is contended that there is an express bar to claiming the relief of removal of the auditor without following the procedure under Section 225 of the Act 28 Mr Ganju, learned Senior counsel refers to the various decisions including Anil Gupta v JK Gupta 2002 (110) CC 610 (P & H), Kamal CS (OS) India - Maharashtra circa 1995 flag 2
Reckitt Benckiser (India) v Naga Ltd 104 DLT 490 India - Delhi circa 1995 flag 5
Manohar Lal Chatrath v Municipal Corporation of Delhi 77 DLT 5 India - Delhi circa 1995 flag 1
9 CPC 29 9 CPC 29 Canada circa 1995 flag 1
Hari Bhagwan Sharma v Badri Bhagat Jhandewalan Temple Society 27 DLT 68 India - Delhi circa 1995 flag 2
Suraj Bhan Anil Kumar & Anr Vs M/s Molu Ram Kapoor Chand 82 DLT 277 India - Delhi circa 1995 flag 3
[1999] Rajasthan 235 [1999] Rajasthan 235 India - Rajasthan circa 1999 flag 1
Gaganmal Ramchand v The Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation AIR 37 Bom 345 India - Maharashtra circa 1995 flag 1
Transcore v Union of India (2008) 1 SCC 125 circa 2008 26
Neeru Malik 154 DLT 354 India - Delhi circa 1995 flag 1
Federal Hotel Sdn Bhd v National Union of Hotel, Bar and Restaurant Workers [1980] 1 MLJ 175 Malaysia circa 1980 LexisNexis flag 7

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback