LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Appasamy S D M v State Insurance Co of Mauritius Ltd - 2006 Int 125   flag 

[2006] MUIntC 140
Intermediate Court of Mauritius
Mauritius
10th March, 2006

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Reekoye v Mauritius Union Assurance Co Ltd [2004] SCJ 66 Supreme Court of Canada Canada circa 2004 flag 7
[1996] Media Review 41 [1996] Media Review 41 Media Review circa 1996 7
[1993] Media Review 251 [1993] Media Review 251 Media Review circa 1993 4
Ketteman v Hansel Properties Ltd [1987] AC 189; [1988] 1 All ER 38; [1987] 2 WLR 312 United Kingdom circa 1987 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 592
Joomun v Kissoondharry [1977] Media Review 256 Media Review circa 1977 7
[1966] Media Review 122 [1966] Media Review 122 Media Review circa 1966 4
Dornan v J W Ellis & Co Ltd (1962) 1 KB 583 United Kingdom circa 1962 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 1
[1960] Media Review 127 [1960] Media Review 127 Media Review circa 1960 2
GL Baker Ltd v Medway Building and Supplies Ltd [1958] 3 All ER 540; [1958] 1 WLR 1216 United Kingdom circa 1958 LexisNexis flag 156
(1) The court is more strict in granting applications for amendment at the trial than before the trial An amendment which is substantial and raises new issues which are inconsistent with those found in a statement of claim will not be granted – Tive Hive Ors v Kam Tim [1953] Media Review 80 Media Review circa 1953 7
Shoe Machinery Co v Cultam (1896) 1 Ch 108; 12 RPC 530 Court of Chancery United Kingdom circa 1896 LexisNexis / Westlaw flag 38
Cropper v Smith [1884] UKLawRpCh 91; (1884) 26 Ch D 700; (1884) 51 LT 729; 53 LJCh 891 Court of Chancery United Kingdom 24 Mar 1884 CommonLII flag 509

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback