LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Reekoye v Mauritius Union Assurance Co Ltd |
|
Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | circa 2004 |
|
||
[1996] Media Review 41 |
|
Media Review | circa 1996 |
|
|||
[1993] Media Review 251 |
|
Media Review | circa 1993 |
|
|||
Ketteman v Hansel Properties Ltd |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1987 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
Joomun v Kissoondharry |
|
Media Review | circa 1977 |
|
|||
[1966] Media Review 122 |
|
Media Review | circa 1966 |
|
|||
Dornan v J W Ellis & Co Ltd |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1962 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
||
[1960] Media Review 127 |
|
Media Review | circa 1960 |
|
|||
GL Baker Ltd v Medway Building and Supplies Ltd |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1958 | LexisNexis |
|
||
(1) The court is more strict in granting applications for amendment at the trial than before the trial An amendment which is substantial and raises new issues which are inconsistent with those found in a statement of claim will not be granted – Tive Hive Ors v Kam Tim |
|
Media Review | circa 1953 |
|
|||
Shoe Machinery Co v Cultam |
|
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | circa 1896 | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
|
|
Cropper v Smith |
[1884] UKLawRpCh 91; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 24 Mar 1884 | CommonLII |
|