LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

"Restriction of Access to Healthcare by Patent Law: Fact or Fiction, The"    

Legislation Cited

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
"Myriad Genetics: Patent Law and Genetic Testing"	[2003] European Intellectual Property Review 20	European Intellectual Property Review	United Kingdom	circa 2003	Westlaw		2
Aktiebolaget Hassle v Alphapharm Pty Ltd	[2002] HCA 59; (2002) 212 CLR 411; (2002) 194 ALR 485; (2002) 56 IPR 129; (2002) 77 ALJR 398; [2003] AIPC 91-838	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	12 Dec 2002	AustLII		564
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v FH Faulding & Co Ltd	[2000] FCA 316; (2000) 97 FCR 524; (2000) 170 ALR 439; (2000) 46 IPR 553; [2000] AIPC 37,298	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	22 Mar 2000	AustLII		304
Bristol-Myers	(2000) 170 AR 439			circa 2000			1
"Patents: Breaking into the Loop"	(1998) 20 Sydney Law Review 553	Sydney Law Review	Australia	circa 1998	AustLII		4
"Legislative Restriction on Medical and Surgical Procedure Patents Removes Impediment to Medical Progress"	(1996) 4 University of Baltimore Intellectual Property Law Journal 91	University of Baltimore Intellectual Property Law Journal	United States	circa 1996	LexisNexis		1
"The Case for Patenting Medical Procedures"	(1996) 22 American Journal of Law and Medicine 85	American Journal of Law and Medicine	United States	circa 1996			1
"Of Patents and Patients: New Monopolies in Medical Methods"	(1995) 6 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 5	Australian Intellectual Property Journal	Australia	circa 1995	Legal Online		3
Anaesthetic Supplies Pty Ltd v Rescare Ltd	[1994] FCA 1065; (1994) 50 FCR 1; (1994) 122 ALR 141; [1994] AIPC 91-076; 28 IPR 383	Federal Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	5 May 1994	AustLII		76
"Editorial – Patenting Therapeutic Treatments and Methods"	(1994) 2 Journal of Law and Medicine 87	Journal of Law and Medicine	Australia	circa 1994	Legal Online		1
"Should Genes Be Patented? The Gene Patenting Controversy: Legal, Ethical and Policy Foundations of an International Agreement"	(1994) 231 Law and Policy in International Business 101	Law and Policy in International Business	United States	circa 1994	HeinOnline		1
Wellcome Foundation Ltd v Commissioner of Patents	[1983] NZLR 385; (1983) 2 IPR 156		New Zealand	circa 1983	LexisNexis		33
[1978] ATS 1980	[1978] ATS 1980		Australia	circa 1980	AustLII		1
Joos v Commissioner of Patents	[1972] HCA 38; (1972) 126 CLR 611; [1972-73] ALR 831; [1973] RPC 59; 46 ALJR 438; 1A IPR 172	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	25 Jul 1972	AustLII		38
National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents	[1959] HCA 67; (1959) 102 CLR 252; [1960] ALR 114; 1A IPR 63	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	16 Dec 1959	AustLII		378
Maeder v Busch	[1938] HCA 8; (1938) 59 CLR 684	High Court of Australia	Australia - Commonwealth	1 Mar 1938	AustLII		20
C & W ’ s Application	(1914) 31 RPC 235			circa 1914			16
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights	[1869] UNTS 299		International	circa 1869			53