LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite

Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Interpretación prejudicial del art culo 83 literal a) de la Decisión 344 de la Comisión del Acuerdo de Cartagena, solicitada por el Consejo de Estado de la República de Colombia, Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Primera. Interpretación de oficio del art culo 81 de la misma Decisión. Actor: HOECHST AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Marca: "AMARYL" (PROCESO Nº 12-IP-2003)   flag 

[2003] ACCJ 17
Court of Justice of the Andean Community
International
6th March, 2003

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
8 Equitable Lawyer 26 8 Equitable Lawyer 26 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 1
7 Equitable Lawyer 28 7 Equitable Lawyer 28 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 3
5 Equitable Lawyer 29 5 Equitable Lawyer 29 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 2
1 Equitable Lawyer 15 1 Equitable Lawyer 15 Equitable Lawyer United Kingdom flag 1

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback