Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Interpretación Prejudicial de los art culos 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 25 y 143 de la Decisión 344 de la Comisión del Acuerdo de Cartagena, requerida por la Segunda Sala del Tribunal de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Distrito de Quito, República del Ecuador. Actor: DR. KARL THOMAE GmbH. Patente: "PROCEDIMIENTO PARA PREPARAR TETRAHIDRO-BENZOTIAZOLES" (PROCESO Nº 26-IP-2002)

Court of Justice of the Andean Community

International

2nd May, 2002

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
[1996] Equitable Lawyer 16	[1996] Equitable Lawyer 16	Equitable Lawyer	United Kingdom	circa 1996			1
5 Equitable Lawyer 8	5 Equitable Lawyer 8	Equitable Lawyer	United Kingdom				8
4 Equitable Lawyer 6	4 Equitable Lawyer 6	Equitable Lawyer	United Kingdom				3
1 Equitable Lawyer 19	1 Equitable Lawyer 19	Equitable Lawyer	United Kingdom				2

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback