LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Blythswood Investments (Scotland) Ltd v Clydesdale Electrical Stores Ltd (in receivership)   flag  9

[1995] SLT 150
Scots Law Times
United Kingdom - Scotland

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
Prow v Argyll & Bute Council [2012] ScotCS CSOH_77 Scottish Court of Session United Kingdom - Scotland 9 May 2012 BAILII flag
Crieff Highland Gathering Ltd v Perth And Kinross Council [2011] ScotCS CSOH_78 Scottish Court of Session United Kingdom - Scotland 12 May 2011 BAILII flag
Batt Cables Plc v Spencer Business Parks Ltd [2010] ScotCS CSOH_81 Scottish Court of Session United Kingdom - Scotland 1 Jul 2010 BAILII flag
Maris v Banchoiry Squash Racquets Club Ltd [2007] ScotCS CSIH_30 Scottish Court of Session United Kingdom - Scotland 25 Apr 2007 BAILII flag
Euro Properties Scotland Ltd v Alam [2000] ScotCS 170 Scottish Court of Session United Kingdom - Scotland 20 Jun 2000 BAILII flag
McGhie v Dunedin Property Investment Co Ltd [1998] ScotCS 53 Scottish Court of Session United Kingdom - Scotland 5 Nov 1998 BAILII flag
Aubrey Investments Ltd v DSC (Realisations) Ltd [1998] ScotCS 9; [1999] SC 21 Scottish Court of Session United Kingdom - Scotland 11 Aug 1998 BAILII flag 3

Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case

Journal Article Title Citation(s) Author Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
- Aspects of Leases: Termination (Discussion Paper) [2018] SLC 165 Scottish Law Commission United Kingdom - Scotland circa 2018 BAILII flag
"attractive" remedy than it is at present, by placing it closer to other remedies for breach of a lease, for example rescission Reforming the law so as to provide that rights or liabilities which have accrued prior to the irritancy are not affected would mean that a relevant claim for damages could be made So the landlord, in that scenario, would achieve both the removal of the tenant (as with irritancy presently) and also be able to recover any debts due [271] As noted above, it is generally agreed by stakeholders that irritancy is (and should be) a remedy of last resort Our 2003 Report described the primary function of irritancy as a "compulsitor [1992] SLC 191 Scottish Law Commission United Kingdom - Scotland circa 1992 BAILII flag

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback