Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

IN THE MATTER of Section 11A of the CITY AREA LEASES ORDINANCE 1936 AND IN THE MATTER of an application by TEKMAT INVESTMENTS (formerly AXIOM) PTY Ltd to vary the provisions of R Lease relating to Block 1 Section 24 Division of TURNER in the AU

[1987] ACTSC 240

Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory

Australia - Australian Capital Territory

27th November, 1987

Legislation Cited

Legislation Name	Provision
Supreme Court Act 1933 (ACT)
Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court Act 1933 (Cth)	s8AB

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction	Date †	Full Text		Citation Index
Morpath Pty Ltd v ACT Youth Accommodation Group Inc	(1987) 16 FCR 325; (1987) 74 ALR 121; (1987) 65 LGRA 180	Federal Court of Australia	Australia	circa 1987	Legal Online / Westlaw		58
Axiom Pty Ltd & City Area Leases Ordinance 1936, Re	(1986) 66 ACTR 1; (1986) 83 FLR 259; (1986) 63 LGRA 142		Australia - Australian Capital Territory	circa 1986	LexisNexis AU		18
Pittalis v Sherefettin	[1986] QB 868; [1986] 2 All ER 227; [1986] 2 WLR 1003		United Kingdom	circa 1986	LexisNexis / Westlaw		95
Re Bailey's Application and re Australian Capital Press Holding Ltd's Application	(1966) 10 FLR 175		Australia	circa 1966	Legal Online / Westlaw		9
City Area Leases Ordinance; Ex parte A Hordern & Sons Ltd	(1963) 9 LGRA 190		Australia	circa 1963			8
Millensted v Grosvenor House (Park Lane) Ltd	[1937] 1 KB 717; [1937] 1 All ER 736		United Kingdom	circa 1937	LexisNexis / Westlaw		70

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback