|
In the matter of an application by Valerie Peers for leave to issue or file
|
[2024] HCASJ 36
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
20 Sep 2024
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Pridgeon, In the matter of an application for leave to issue or file
|
[2021] HCATrans 60
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
9 Apr 2021
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Austin v Dwyer
|
[2018] VSC 770
|
Supreme Court of Victoria
|
Australia - Victoria
|
10 Dec 2018
|
AustLII
|
|
11 
|
|
R v HG; R v We (No 1)
|
[2019] NSWSC 573
|
Supreme Court of New South Wales
|
Australia - New South Wales
|
24 Jul 2018
|
AustLII
|
|
1
|
|
Webb v Secretary to the Department of Justice
|
[2015] VSC 616
|
Supreme Court of Victoria
|
Australia - Victoria
|
12 Nov 2015
|
AustLII
|
|
1
|
|
R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 3)
|
[2015] NSWSC 965
|
Supreme Court of New South Wales
|
Australia - New South Wales
|
21 Jul 2015
|
AustLII
|
|
16
|
|
Knight v Money
|
[2015] VSC 105
|
Supreme Court of Victoria
|
Australia - Victoria
|
24 Mar 2015
|
AustLII
|
|
16
|
|
Fiorentino v Administrative Appeals Tribunal
|
[2014] FCA 735
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
7 Jul 2014
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
"Table of Cases"
|
[2014] ELECD 35
|
Edited Legal Collections Data
|
Australia
|
circa 2014
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Australian Education Union v Lawler
|
[2008] FCAFC 135; (2008) 169 FCR 327; (2008) 714 IR 140; (2008) 104 ALD 258
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
18 Jul 2008
|
AustLII
|
|
39
|
|
Knight v Anderson
|
[2007] VSC 278; (2007) 16 VR 532
|
Supreme Court of Victoria
|
Australia - Victoria
|
1 Aug 2007
|
AustLII
|
|
21
|
|
CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union - re Appeals against refusals to find industrial dispute; jurisdiction; whether classes of employment subject to dispute within eligibility coverage of CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union, (CPSU); construction of eligibility rule; leave to appeal allowed; meaning of expression 'part of a business, whose principal function is incidental, ancillary or complementary to the supply of telecommunication services'; whether activities of employers properly characterised as being within that industry description; principles of construction of union eligibility rule; manner in which rule came about is a relevant consideration in construction of rule; consideration of history of rule in perspective with use of similar words in statute and case law; use of expressions elsewhere in rules; meaning of 'business', 'part of a business' and 'principal function'; history of reference to 'part of a single business' in enterprise bargaining and transmission of business provisions in Act; consideration of reasons given by designated Presidential Member when making initial alteration and reasons stated for second alteration; for the purpose of the rule, 'business' connotes the organisation of work or resources by an employer, for commercial, public purpose or like activity; 'part of a business' connotes an identifiable or discrete activity within a business of the kind described; the expression 'whose principal function' denotes a requirement that, from the whole or substantial portion of the relevant business or organisation of work, the effective outcome be activity of the relevant description; the organisation of work by EDS pursuant to a contract for services to support systems used by Telstra and the organisation of work by it within a particular organisational unit within the CPSUs eligibility coverage; so is the organisation of work by IBM GSA pursuant to a contract for services to Telstra; each appeal allowed; finding of dispute made on determination of each appeal - PR939419
|
|
Australian Industrial Relations Commission
|
Australia
|
17 Oct 2003
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002
|
[2003] HCA 30; (2003) 198 ALR 59; (2003) 73 ALD 1; (2003) 24 Leg Rep 10; (2003) 77 ALJR 1165
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
17 Jun 2003
|
AustLII
|
|
1445
|
|
Re Australian Workers' Union; Ex parte Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union
|
[2002] FCAFC 150; (2002) 120 FCR 527
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
27 May 2002
|
AustLII
|
|
23
|
|
Alam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
|
[2002] FCA 630; 121 FCR 471
|
Federal Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
16 May 2002
|
AustLII
|
|
10
|
|
McBain, Re; Ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference
|
[2002] HCA 16; (2002) 209 CLR 372; (2002) 188 ALR 1; (2002) 76 ALJR 694; [2002] EOC 93-207; (2002) 23 Leg Rep 2
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
18 Apr 2002
|
AustLII
|
|
326
|
|
Re Ruddock S28/2000
|
[2000] HCATrans 139
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
28 Mar 2000
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Suter v Commissioner of Police (NT)
|
[1998] NTSC 81; 147 FLR 111
|
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
|
Australia - Northern Territory
|
11 Sep 1998
|
AustLII
|
|
3
|
|
Hollier M75/1998
|
[1998] HCATrans 310
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
28 Aug 1998
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Martin Kingham, Vince Raffa, Bill Oliver, Wayne Torpy, Dirk Van Dam, Victor Nicoli, Bernard Giagnacova, Gerard Lavery, Roy Williams, Frank o'Grady, Malcolm Ratel, John McPartlin, Patrick Lennon, David Noonan, John Loh, David Pillar, John Canning and Zelko Prazak
|
[1995] IRCA 92
|
Industrial Relations Court of Australia
|
Australia
|
3 Mar 1995
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Re Australian Bank Employees Union; Ex parte Citicorp Australia Ltd
|
[1989] HCA 41; (1989) 167 CLR 513; 63 ALJR 602; (1989) 29 IR 148
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
3 Oct 1989
|
AustLII
|
|
267
|
|
Re Queensland Electricity Commission; Ex parte Electrical Trades Union of Australia
|
[1987] HCA 27; (1987) 72 ALR 1; (1987) 61 ALJR 393; (1987) 21 IR 151; 281 P 348
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
1 Jul 1987
|
AustLII
|
|
301
|
