LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Nabibux Muhammad Sulleman v Emperor    

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s) †	Court	Jurisdiction	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
[1941] Bom 854	[1941] Bom 854		India - Maharashtra	circa 1941			1
[1941] Bom 191; 42 Bom 132	[1941] Bom 191; 42 Bom 132		India - Maharashtra	circa 1941			1
[1937] Bom 578	[1937] Bom 578		India - Maharashtra	circa 1937			2
193 IC 229	193 IC 229		United Kingdom				1
169 IC 274	169 IC 274		United Kingdom				4
47 Bom 57818	47 Bom 57818		India - Maharashtra				2
42 IC 317	42 IC 317		United Kingdom				1
40 Cr LJ 468	40 Cr LJ 468		India				6
38 Cr LJ 723	38 Cr LJ 723		India				3
32 SLR 5671	32 SLR 5671		Singapore - Singapore		LexisNexis		1
32 SLR 567	32 SLR 567		Singapore - Singapore		LexisNexis		4
Air 1941 Sind 204	AIR 1941 Sind 204		Pakistan	circa 1941			1
Air 1941 Bom 85	AIR 1941 Bom 85		India - Maharashtra	circa 1941			1
Ltd "In view of the award passed by the undersigned arbitrators adjudicating upon all their disputes this C P C j-- (a) (**40)*Chitaley, S 115, N 9, Pt 3 suit be dismissed with no order as to costs The (*41) Mulla, Page 420 Pt (p) a * ejectment proceedings taken by Jumo shall likewise (b) ('40) Chitaley, Sch II Para 17, N 3, Pts 3 be dismissed with r o order as to costs ** to 5; Para 20 N 5 Pt 1 Para 21 N 7 i The objections ti ken to this award on behalf of (c) ('40) Chitaley, Sch II Para 21 N 7 the present applicant before the learned Judge in the lower Court were that the award did not decide the dispute between the parties, and it was not an A I R (29) 1942 Sind 45 award because it c id not relate even in part to the subject-matter of the other award under the Arbi Davis 0 J and Weston J, tration Act, that the award was bad, and that it was coloured by matters extraneous to the suit, and Nabibux Muhammad Sulleman and that as it was bad on the face of it, there was no others -- Applicants , award at all We think the two awards must be taken together and that as the first award is found v to be invalid, the second award, which is depen Emperor dant upon the fiist, cannot stand Both clearly Criminal Revn Applns			India	circa 1939			18
Champsey Bhara Co v The Jivraj Balloo Spinning & Weaving Co Ltd	AIR 1923 PC 66	Privy Council	India	circa 1923			11
Air 1923 PC 66	AIR 1923 PC 66	Privy Council	India	circa 1923			26