LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Case | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Case | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Case | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

Bobba Varalakshmamma v Kosaraju Jannayya   flag 

[1942] AllINRprMad 172; [1943] AIR Mad 318
All India Reporter - Madras
India - Tamil Nadu
7th October, 1942

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
[1985] Mad 893 [1985] Mad 893 India circa 1985 flag 1
[1942] Mad 78 [1942] Mad 78 India circa 1942 flag 2
(1941) 2 MLJ 655 (1941) 2 MLJ 655 Malaysia circa 1941 LexisNexis flag 2
[1941-2] MLJ 655 [1941-2] MLJ 655 Malaysia circa 1941 LexisNexis flag 3
[1939] Lah 210 [1939] Lah 210 Pakistan circa 1939 flag 2
Note "First, where . . · · ^ deposited within aforesaid time. purchaser.'* Where the decree-holder auction purchaser who P. Sivaramakrishnayya -- for Appellant. has obtained permission to set off deposits the dif ference between the amount for which he purchased A. Lakshmayya and N. F. B. Sankar Bao -- for Respondent. the property and the amount due to him under the decree, within 15 days from the date of the sale the Judgment.--These arise of an application provisions of O. 21, R. 85 are complied with. It is to execute the decree in O. S. No. 53 of 1935 not necessary for the decree-holder auction purchaser to pay within 15 days from the date of sale that on the file of the District Munsif's Court of portion of the amount that may be payable rateably Masulipatam. It was a simple money decree. to the other creditors who may claim a share in the The properties of the judgment-debtor were assets realised by the sale. Therefore, the non-pay attached and sold in a court sale held on 2nd ment by the decree-holder purchaser of the money payable to the creditor entitled to rateable distribu July 1936. The decree-holder had obtained tion within 15 days from the date of the sale does permission to bid and set off and his bid for not justify the setting aside of the sale : ('35) 22 Rs. 1562 was accepted. The amount shown India - Tamil Nadu circa 1935 flag 2
[1933] Australian Law Journal 1488 [1933] Australian Law Journal 1488 Australian Law Journal Australia circa 1933 Legal Online flag 1
319/ P 320 319/ P 320 circa 1935 2
201 IC 195 201 IC 195 United Kingdom circa 1935 flag 2
186 IC 152 186 IC 152 United Kingdom circa 1935 flag 2
159 IC 228 159 IC 228 United Kingdom circa 1935 flag 1
59 Mad 3421 59 Mad 3421 India circa 1935 flag 1
59 Mad 342 59 Mad 342 India flag 1
41 PLB 568 41 PLB 568 United Kingdom flag 2
11 Mad 3562 11 Mad 3562 India circa 1935 flag 1
Mangat Bai v Duli- Z (*88) 11 Mad 356 India circa 1935 flag 4

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback