LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
[1985] Mad 893 |
|
India | circa 1985 |
|
|||
[1942] Mad 78 |
|
India | circa 1942 |
|
|||
(1941) 2 MLJ 655 |
|
Malaysia | circa 1941 | LexisNexis |
|
||
[1941-2] MLJ 655 |
|
Malaysia | circa 1941 | LexisNexis |
|
||
[1939] Lah 210 |
|
Pakistan | circa 1939 |
|
|||
Note "First, where . . · · ^ deposited within aforesaid time. purchaser.'* Where the decree-holder auction purchaser who P. Sivaramakrishnayya -- for Appellant. has obtained permission to set off deposits the dif ference between the amount for which he purchased A. Lakshmayya and N. F. B. Sankar Bao -- for Respondent. the property and the amount due to him under the decree, within 15 days from the date of the sale the Judgment.--These arise of an application provisions of O. 21, R. 85 are complied with. It is to execute the decree in O. S. No. 53 of 1935 not necessary for the decree-holder auction purchaser to pay within 15 days from the date of sale that on the file of the District Munsif's Court of portion of the amount that may be payable rateably Masulipatam. It was a simple money decree. to the other creditors who may claim a share in the The properties of the judgment-debtor were assets realised by the sale. Therefore, the non-pay attached and sold in a court sale held on 2nd ment by the decree-holder purchaser of the money payable to the creditor entitled to rateable distribu July 1936. The decree-holder had obtained tion within 15 days from the date of the sale does permission to bid and set off and his bid for not justify the setting aside of the sale : ('35) 22 Rs. 1562 was accepted. The amount shown | India - Tamil Nadu | circa 1935 |
|
||||
[1933] Australian Law Journal 1488 |
|
Australian Law Journal | Australia | circa 1933 | Legal Online |
|
|
319/ P 320 |
|
circa 1935 |
|
||||
201 IC 195 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1935 |
|
|||
186 IC 152 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1935 |
|
|||
159 IC 228 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1935 |
|
|||
59 Mad 3421 |
|
India | circa 1935 |
|
|||
59 Mad 342 |
|
India |
|
||||
41 PLB 568 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
11 Mad 3562 |
|
India | circa 1935 |
|
|||
Mangat Bai v Duli- Z (*88) |
|
India | circa 1935 |
|