LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
[1930] Mad 239 |
|
India | circa 1930 |
|
|||
Kothandapani v Dhanammal (Kunhi "Raman J) v Madras 258 a to take as the date from which limitation habitation It can only amount to a promise e begins to run the date at which the last of to compensate a person who has voluntarily these creditors became aware of the transac rendered service for the promisor within the tion and it is impossible that all the creditors meaning of S 25, cl (2), Contract Act, and of the insolvent were all aware of the trans as such it is a valid contract He concedes action so long ago as 1932 In the result the that the Bombay High Court has taken a appeal must fail and is dismissed with costs different view in the cases in 25 Bom L R (Leave refused) 2522 and |
|
India - Maharashtra | circa 1930 |
|
|||
[1930] Mad 956 |
|
India | circa 1930 |
|
|||
[1924] Bom 135 |
|
India - Maharashtra | circa 1924 |
|
|||
(1920) 44 Bom 542 |
|
India - Maharashtra | circa 1920 |
|
|||
[1920] Bom 142 |
|
India - Maharashtra | circa 1920 |
|
|||
128 IC 689 |
|
United Kingdom | circa 1930 |
|
|||
86 IC 240 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
59 MLJ 596 |
|
Malaysia | circa 1930 | LexisNexis |
|
||
57 IC 472 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
||||
25 Bom LR 252 |
|
India - Maharashtra |
|
||||
22 Bom LR 762 |
|
India - Maharashtra |
|
||||
13 MLJ 7 |
|
Malaysia | LexisNexis |
|