R v Grant
|
[1996] 1 Cr App R 73
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1996
|
LexisNexis
|
|
18
|
Air
|
AIR 1923 Lahore 104
|
|
India - Punjab
|
circa 1923
|
|
|
1
|
Air 1923 Cal 453
|
AIR 1923 Cal 453
|
|
India - West Bengal
|
circa 1923
|
|
|
1
|
(1922) 16 Cr App R 115
|
(1922) 16 Cr App R 115
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1922
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
(1922) 17 Cr App R 5
|
(1922) 17 Cr App R 5
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1922
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
R v Ckattaway
|
(1922) 17 Cr App R 71
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1922
|
LexisNexis
|
|
3
|
[1921] Cal 1
|
[1921] Cal 1
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1921
|
|
|
6
|
[1921] Cal 241
|
[1921] Cal 241
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1921
|
|
|
1
|
Po Myaing v Emperor
|
[1920] AllINRprLB 64; 10 LBR 269; 13 Bur LT 158; [1920] AIR LB 116
|
All India Reporter - Lower Burma
|
Myanmar
|
27 May 1920
|
AsianLII
|
|
1
|
Crane v DPP
|
(1920) 3 KB 236; [1921] 2 AC 299; [1921] All ER 19; (1921) 15 Cr App R 183; (1920) 2 New Zealand Police Law Reports 224; 90 LJKB 1160
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1920
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
103
|
West India Electric Co v Roberts
|
[1920] AC 1025
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1920
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
7
|
(1920) 84 JP 67
|
(1920) 84 JP 67
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1920
|
|
|
1
|
(1920) 21 Cr LJ 734
|
(1920) 21 Cr LJ 734
|
|
India
|
circa 1920
|
|
|
1
|
(1920) 15 Cr App R 96
|
(1920) 15 Cr App R 96
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1920
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
(1919) 23 CWN 426
|
(1919) 23 CWN 426
|
|
India
|
circa 1919
|
|
|
1
|
(1919) 18 Public Law Review 1919
|
(1919) 18 Public Law Review 1919
|
Public Law Review
|
Australia
|
circa 1919
|
Legal Online
|
|
1
|
(1919) 20 Cr LJ 289
|
(1919) 20 Cr LJ 289
|
|
India
|
circa 1919
|
|
|
1
|
(1919) 17 Australian Law Journal 1095
|
(1919) 17 Australian Law Journal 1095
|
Australian Law Journal
|
Australia
|
circa 1919
|
Legal Online
|
|
1
|
[1918] 1 KB 216
|
[1918] 1 KB 216
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1918
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
10
|
[1917] 2 KB 855
|
[1917] 2 KB 855
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1917
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
1
|
R v O'Donnell
|
(1917) 12 Cr App R 219
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1917
|
LexisNexis
|
|
18
|
(1917) 44 Cal 477
|
(1917) 44 Cal 477
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1917
|
|
|
3
|
(1917) 44 Cal 1025-21
|
(1917) 44 Cal 1025-21
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1917
|
|
|
1
|
(1917) 18 Cr LJ 382-38
|
(1917) 18 Cr LJ 382-38
|
|
India
|
circa 1917
|
|
|
1
|
(1916) 14 Australian Law Journal 792
|
(1916) 14 Australian Law Journal 792
|
Australian Law Journal
|
Australia
|
circa 1916
|
Legal Online
|
|
1
|
(1915) 17 Bom LR 906
|
(1915) 17 Bom LR 906
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1915
|
|
|
1
|
(1915) 21 CLJ 396-19
|
(1915) 21 CLJ 396-19
|
|
|
circa 1915
|
|
|
1
|
Emperor v A J Cooke
|
[1914] AllINRprLB 8; 7 LBR 319; 7 Bur LT 187; [1914] AIR LB 23
|
All India Reporter - Lower Burma
|
Myanmar
|
23 Feb 1914
|
AsianLII
|
|
1
|
[1914] AC 25
|
[1914] AC 25
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1914
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
82
|
Air
|
AIR 1914 PC 116
|
Privy Council
|
India
|
circa 1914
|
|
|
7
|
[1914] MWN 506
|
[1914] MWN 506
|
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
circa 1914
|
|
|
1
|
(1914) 111 LT 167
|
(1914) 111 LT 167
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1914
|
|
|
1
|
(1914) 41 Cal 754-18
|
(1914) 41 Cal 754-18
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1914
|
|
|
1
|
R v Wilson
|
(1913) 9 Cr App R 124
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1913
|
LexisNexis
|
|
11
|
(1913) 9 Cr App R 120
|
(1913) 9 Cr App R 120
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1913
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
(1913) 8 Cr App R 198
|
(1913) 8 Cr App R 198
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1913
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
(1913) 9 Cr App R 94
|
(1913) 9 Cr App R 94
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1913
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
R v Law
|
(1913) 9 Cr App R 246; 24 Cox CC 586
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1913
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
(1912) 36 Bom 524
|
(1912) 36 Bom 524
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1912
|
|
|
3
|
(1912) 16 CWN 909-13
|
(1912) 16 CWN 909-13
|
|
India
|
circa 1912
|
|
|
1
|
(1912) 16 CLJ 440-17
|
(1912) 16 CLJ 440-17
|
|
|
circa 1912
|
|
|
1
|
[1912] MWN 549
|
[1912] MWN 549
|
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
circa 1912
|
|
|
1
|
R v Wann
|
(1912) 7 Cr App R 135
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1912
|
LexisNexis
|
|
7
|
R v Wann
|
(1912) 107 LT 462
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1912
|
|
|
3
|
(1912) 9 Australian Law Journal 180
|
(1912) 9 Australian Law Journal 180
|
Australian Law Journal
|
Australia
|
circa 1912
|
Legal Online
|
|
4
|
(1912) 15 Bom LR 303
|
(1912) 15 Bom LR 303
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1912
|
|
|
1
|
[1911] 5 SLR 247
|
[1911] 5 SLR 247
|
|
Singapore - Singapore
|
circa 1911
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
Rex v Dickman
|
(1910) 74 JP 449
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1910
|
|
|
2
|
R v West
|
(1910) 4 Cr App R 179
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1910
|
LexisNexis
|
|
5
|
R v Stoddart
|
(1909) 2 Cr App R 217
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1909
|
LexisNexis
|
|
46
|
(1909) 10 CLJ 13
|
(1909) 10 CLJ 13
|
|
|
circa 1909
|
|
|
1
|
(1909) 36 Cal 302-13
|
(1909) 36 Cal 302-13
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1909
|
|
|
1
|
R v Cohen and Bateman
|
(1909) 2 Cr App R 197; 73 JP 352
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1909
|
LexisNexis
|
|
48
|
(1908) 36 Cal 659-13
|
(1908) 36 Cal 659-13
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1908
|
|
|
1
|
(1908) 9 CLJ 55
|
(1908) 9 CLJ 55
|
|
|
circa 1908
|
|
|
1
|
[1908] 4 LBR 271
|
[1908] 4 LBR 271
|
|
Myanmar
|
circa 1908
|
|
|
1
|
Baleshwar Bagarti v Bhagirathi Dass ILR
|
(1908) 35 Cal 701
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1908
|
|
|
11
|
(1907) 9 Bom LR 356
|
(1907) 9 Bom LR 356
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1907
|
|
|
3
|
(1907) 35 Cal 34
|
(1907) 35 Cal 34
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1907
|
|
|
4
|
(1907) 14 Bur LR 264
|
(1907) 14 Bur LR 264
|
|
Myanmar
|
circa 1907
|
|
|
1
|
(1907) 11 CWN 1085-6
|
(1907) 11 CWN 1085-6
|
|
India
|
circa 1907
|
|
|
1
|
(1907)
|
(1907) 32 Bom 111
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1907
|
|
|
3
|
[1907] Awn 51
|
[1907] AWN 51
|
|
India - Uttar Pradesh
|
circa 1907
|
|
|
1
|
[1906] 3 LBR 264
|
[1906] 3 LBR 264
|
|
Myanmar
|
circa 1906
|
|
|
1
|
(1906) 12 CWN 530
|
(1906) 12 CWN 530
|
|
India
|
circa 1906
|
|
|
1
|
(1906) 8 Bom LR 240
|
(1906) 8 Bom LR 240
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1906
|
|
|
5
|
R v Bridgwater
|
[1904] UKLawRpKQB 190; (1905) 1 KB 131
|
|
United Kingdom
|
30 Nov 1904
|
CommonLII
|
|
10
|
[1904] 1 Cr LJ 920
|
[1904] 1 Cr LJ 920
|
|
India
|
circa 1904
|
|
|
1
|
(1904) 38 CLJ 309
|
(1904) 38 CLJ 309
|
|
|
circa 1904
|
|
|
1
|
(1902) 29 Cal 496
|
(1902) 29 Cal 496
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1902
|
|
|
1
|
Quinn v Leathem
|
[1901] UKHL 2; [1901] AC 495
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
5 Aug 1901
|
BAILII
|
|
28
|
(1900) 1 LBR 233
|
(1900) 1 LBR 233
|
|
Myanmar
|
circa 1900
|
|
|
1
|
(1900) 27 Cal 566
|
(1900) 27 Cal 566
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1900
|
|
|
2
|
R v Saunders
|
[1899] UKLawRpKQB 28; 1899 1 QB 490
|
|
United Kingdom
|
9 Feb 1899
|
CommonLII
|
|
5
|
[1899] Awn 76
|
[1899] AWN 76
|
|
India - Uttar Pradesh
|
circa 1899
|
|
|
1
|
[1898] 4 CWN 433
|
[1898] 4 CWN 433
|
|
India
|
circa 1898
|
|
|
1
|
(1897) 25 Cal 207
|
(1897) 25 Cal 207
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1897
|
|
|
1
|
(1896) 19 Mad 483
|
(1896) 19 Mad 483
|
|
India
|
circa 1896
|
|
|
4
|
(1896) 19 Mad 482
|
(1896) 19 Mad 482
|
|
India
|
circa 1896
|
|
|
3
|
Narendra Nath Sircar v Kamal Basinl Dasi
|
(1896) 23 Cal 563
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1896
|
|
|
10
|
[1896] AC 44--65
|
[1896] AC 44--65
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1896
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
1
|
Robinson v Canadian Pacific Railway Co
|
[1892] UKLawRpAC 33; [1892] AC 481; (1891) 19 SCR 292
|
|
United Kingdom
|
23 Jul 1892
|
CommonLII
|
|
29
|
Bank of England v Vagliano Brothers
|
[1891] UKLawRpAC 6; [1891] AC 107; 60 LJQB 145; 7 TLR 333; 64 LT 353; 55 JP 676
|
|
United Kingdom
|
5 Mar 1891
|
CommonLII
|
|
201
|
(1889) 16 Cal 238
|
(1889) 16 Cal 238
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1889
|
|
|
1
|
(1888) 15 Cal 595
|
(1888) 15 Cal 595
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1888
|
|
|
2
|
R v Gibson
|
[1887] UKLawRpKQB 27; 18 QBD 537
|
|
United Kingdom
|
8 Mar 1887
|
CommonLII
|
|
71
|
Empress v Dharam Rai
|
[1887] AWN 236
|
|
India - Uttar Pradesh
|
circa 1887
|
|
|
3
|
Abrath v North Eastern Railway Co
|
[1886] UKLawRpAC 15; (1886) 11 AC 247
|
|
United Kingdom
|
15 Mar 1886
|
CommonLII
|
|
29
|
R v Dudley and Stephens
|
(1884) 52 LT 107; (1884) 54 LJMC 32; (1884) 14 QBD 273
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1884
|
|
|
1
|
(1884) 10 Cal 1079
|
(1884) 10 Cal 1079
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1884
|
|
|
2
|
(1884) 14 QBD 273
|
(1884) 14 QBD 273
|
Queen's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1884
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
108
|
R v Coney
|
[1882] UKLawRpKQB 30; (1882) 8 QBD 534; (1882) 51 LJMC 66; 46 LT 307; 46 JP 404
|
|
United Kingdom
|
18 Mar 1882
|
CommonLII
|
|
186
|
(1882) 8 Cal 971
|
(1882) 8 Cal 971
|
|
United States - California
|
circa 1882
|
|
|
1
|
(1882) 8 Cab 739
|
(1882) 8 CAB 739
|
|
United States
|
circa 1882
|
|
|
1
|
R v Salmon
|
[1880] UKLawRpKQB 93; (1880) 6 QBD 79
|
|
United Kingdom
|
4 Dec 1880
|
CommonLII
|
|
14
|
Imperatix v Pitamber
|
(1877) 2 Bom 61
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1877
|
|
|
7
|
[1877] 2 AC 494
|
[1877] 2 AC 494
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1877
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
1
|
(1873) 10 BHC 75
|
(1873) 10 BHC 75
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
circa 1873
|
|
|
1
|
James Brown,-Appellant; Alexander McLachlan,-Respondent
|
[1872] EngR 39; 17 ER 559; (1872) 9 Moore PCCNS 384
|
Privy Council
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1872
|
CommonLII
|
|
1
|
(1872) LR 5 PC 543
|
(1872) LR 5 PC 543
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1872
|
|
|
1
|
Johnson v Emerson
|
[1871] UKLawRpExch 29; LR 6 Exch 329; 40 LJEx 201; 25 LT 337
|
Court of Exchequer
|
United Kingdom
|
7 Jun 1871
|
CommonLII
|
|
33
|
R v Murphy
|
[1869] EngR 37; [1869] UKLawRpPC 14; (1867-69) LR 2 PC 535; (1869) 6 Moore PCCNS 177; 16 ER 693; 38 LJPC 53; 21 LT 598; 17 WR 1047; 11 Cox CC 372
|
Privy Council
|
United Kingdom
|
22 Jun 1869
|
CommonLII
|
|
21
|
R v Bertrand
|
[1826] EngR 836; 4 Moore PCCNS 460; 36 LJPC 51; 10 Cox CC 618; 16 ER 391; 16 WR 9; 31 JP 531; 16 LT 752; 2 C & P 413
|
Privy Council
|
United Kingdom
|
28 Jun 1867
|
CommonLII
|
|
20
|
[1867] LR 1 PC 520
|
[1867] LR 1 PC 520
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1867
|
|
|
73
|
(1867) 7 WR 0
|
(1867) 7 WR 0
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1867
|
|
|
1
|
[1866] 1 Ind Jur 424
|
[1866] 1 Ind Jur 424
|
|
India - West Bengal
|
circa 1866
|
|
|
1
|
R v Aaron Mellor
|
[1858] EngR 84; 169 ER 1084; [1858] Dears & B 468; 6 WR 322; 4 Jur NS 214
|
UK
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1858
|
CommonLII
|
|
12
|
R v Jackson
|
(1857) 7 Cox CC 357; 4 F & F 67
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1857
|
|
|
9
|
R v Scaife, Smith and Rooke
|
[1851] EngR 544; (1851) 17 QB 238; 117 ER 1271
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1851
|
CommonLII
|
|
5
|
[1848] Oudh Law Journal 402
|
[1848] Oudh Law Journal 402
|
Oudh Law Journal
|
India - Uttar Pradesh
|
circa 1848
|
|
|
1
|
R v Martin Kelly and James M'Carthy
|
[1847] EngR 45; 175 ER 157; (1847) 2 Car & Kir 379
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1847
|
CommonLII
|
|
6
|
(1842) 3 Moore Ind App 100
|
(1842) 3 Moore Ind App 100
|
|
India
|
circa 1842
|
|
|
1
|
R v M'Phane, Popham, and Donoghue
|
[1841] EngR 840; 174 ER 476; [1841] Car & M 212
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1841
|
CommonLII
|
|
1
|
R v Ann John and Charles Page
|
[1841] EngR 76; 173 ER 1042; (1841) 9 C & P 761
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1841
|
CommonLII
|
|
1
|
Winter v Butt
|
[1841] EngR 436; (1841) 2 Macl & R 360; 174 ER 316; (1841) 2 M & R 360
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1841
|
CommonLII
|
|
8
|
R v Courvoisier
|
[1840] EngR 719; 173 ER 869; (1839) 9 C & P 362
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1839
|
CommonLII
|
|
2
|
(1839) 9 C & P 129-4
|
(1839) 9 C & P 129-4
|
|
|
circa 1839
|
|
|
1
|
R v Howell, Roberts, Jones, and Wilkes
|
[1839] EngR 970; 173 ER 901; (1839) 9 C & P 437
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1839
|
CommonLII
|
|
9
|
(1837) 7 C & P 801
|
(1837) 7 C & P 801
|
|
|
circa 1837
|
|
|
2
|
Rex v Passey, Meadows,
|
[1836] EngR 486; 173 ER 124; (1836) 7 C & P 282
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1836
|
CommonLII
|
|
4
|
Rex v Lockett
|
[1836] EngR 520; 173 ER 133; (1836) 7 C & P 300
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1836
|
CommonLII
|
|
2
|
Rex v Jordan, Sullivan, Mott, and Seale
|
[1836] EngR 466; 173 ER 192; (1836) 7 C & P 432
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1836
|
CommonLII
|
|
4
|
Rex v Butteris and Grove
|
[1835] EngR 214; 172 ER 1183; (1835) 6 C & P 147
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1835
|
CommonLII
|
|
3
|
R v Grant
|
[1834] EngR 492; [1834] 3 Nev & MKB 106; (1834) 5 B & Ad 1081; 110 ER 1092
|
King's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1834
|
CommonLII
|
|
5
|
Everett v Youells
|
[1833] EngR 544; 110 ER 612; (1833) 4 B & Ad 681
|
Kings Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1833
|
CommonLII
|
|
3
|
[1830] 1 Lew CC 194
|
[1830] 1 Lew CC 194; 168 ER 1009
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1830
|
|
|
5
|
Rex v Owen
|
(1825) 1 Mood CC 96; 168 ER 1200
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1825
|
|
|
7
|
[1697] Foster 393
|
[1697] Foster 393
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1697
|
|
|
1
|
841-10 Cr LJ 186
|
841-10 Cr LJ 186
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
331-29 SLCR 513-16
|
331-29 SLCR 513-16
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
|
|
|
1
|
305-18 Cr LJ 945
|
305-18 Cr LJ 945
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
443-1 Ind Jur NS 177
|
443-1 Ind Jur NS 177
|
|
India - West Bengal
|
|
|
|
1
|
5-13 BLR 23
|
5-13 BLR 23
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
89 LJKB 813
|
89 LJKB 813
|
King's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
73 LT 609
|
73 LT 609
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
R v Stoddart
|
73 JP 348
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
4
|
69 JP 26
|
69 JP 26
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
67 LT 505
|
67 LT 505
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
61 LJPC 69
|
61 LJPC 69
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
58 IC 158
|
58 IC 158
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
55 LT 63
|
55 LT 63
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
55 LJQB 457
|
55 LJQB 457
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
53 WR 415
|
53 WR 415
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
52 IC 791
|
52 IC 791
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
52 IC 395
|
52 IC 395
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
Quinn v Leathem
|
50 WR 139; 70 LJPC 76; 85 LT 289; 65 JP 708; 1 BRC 197; [1901] AC 495
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
10
|
50 JP 659
|
50 JP 659
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
50 IC 977
|
50 IC 977
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
50 IC 337
|
50 IC 337
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
50 Cal 41
|
50 Cal 41
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
1
|
49 JP 69
|
49 JP 69
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
Satish Chandra Chakraworti v Ram Dayal De ILR
|
48 Cal 388
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
8
|
47 IC 805
|
47 IC 805
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
47 Cal 671
|
47 Cal 671
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
4
|
46 IC 709
|
46 IC 709
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
43 LT 573
|
43 LT 573
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
43 IC 438
|
43 IC 438
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
42 Cal 957-19
|
42 Cal 957-19
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
1
|
41 Cal 1072
|
41 Cal 1072
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
2
|
36 IC 577; 20 Cr LJ 711; 17 Cr LJ 529
|
36 IC 577; 20 Cr LJ 711; 17 Cr LJ 529
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
Madras High Court, Muthukumaraswami v King Emperor[4
|
35 Mad 397
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
8
|
31 Cal 142
|
31 Cal 142
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
4
|
30 IC 128-16
|
30 IC 128-16
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
27 Bom 394
|
27 Bom 394
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
9
|
Ayyar v King Emperor
|
25 Mad 61
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
25 Cal 512
|
25 Cal 512
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
4
|
Satish Chandra v Bam Dayalt
|
24 CWN 982
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
5
|
24 Cox CC 227
|
24 Cox CC 227
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
23 IC 1002-15
|
23 IC 1002-15
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
23 IC 195
|
23 IC 195
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
21 CWN 33
|
21 CWN 33
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
2
|
20 Cr LJ 369; 17 Cr LJ 532
|
20 Cr LJ 369; 17 Cr LJ 532
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
20 CLJ 161
|
20 CLJ 161
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
19 IC 331
|
19 IC 331
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
19 Cr LJ 953
|
19 Cr LJ 953
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
4
|
19 Cr LJ 789
|
19 Cr LJ 789
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
18 CWN 785
|
18 CWN 785
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
18 Cr LJ 385
|
18 Cr LJ 385
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
2
|
17 TLR 749
|
17 TLR 749
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
R v Bywaters
|
17 Cr App R 66
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
6
|
17 Cal 642
|
17 Cal 642
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
6
|
16 IC 523
|
16 IC 523
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
16 Cr LJ 745
|
16 Cr LJ 745
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
R v Willett
|
16 Cr App R 146
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
16 Australian Law Journal 731
|
16 Australian Law Journal 731
|
Australian Law Journal
|
Australia
|
|
Legal Online
|
|
1
|
15 SLCR 646; 16 CWN 1077-13
|
15 SLCR 646; 16 CWN 1077-13
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
|
|
|
1
|
15 IC 810
|
15 IC 810
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
15 Cr LJ 243
|
15 Cr LJ 243
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
15 Cox CC 624
|
15 Cox CC 624
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
14 IC 896
|
14 IC 896
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
14 IC 649
|
14 IC 649
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
4
|
14 Cr LJ 685
|
14 Cr LJ 685
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
5
|
14 Cr LJ 235
|
14 Cr LJ 235; 14 Cr LJ 615
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
14 Bom LR 147
|
14 Bom LR 147
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
1
|
14 Bom 115
|
14 Bom 115
|
|
India - Maharashtra
|
|
|
|
3
|
13 Cr LJ 905
|
13 Cr LJ 905
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
13 Cr LJ 352
|
13 Cr LJ 352
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
13 Cr App R 10
|
13 Cr App R 10
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
1
|
13 CR 800
|
13 CR 800
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
12 WR 38
|
12 WR 38
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
12 MLT 1
|
12 MLT 1
|
|
India - Tamil Nadu
|
|
|
|
1
|
12 CWN 657; 7 CLJ 563
|
12 CWN 657; 7 CLJ 563
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
R v Frampton
|
12 Cr App R 202
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
5
|
Bapuji Apaji v Senavaraij Marvadi
|
11 CWN 983
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
11 BLR 347
|
11 BLR 347
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
11 Australian Law Journal 804
|
11 Australian Law Journal 804
|
Australian Law Journal
|
Australia
|
|
Legal Online
|
|
2
|
10 WR 64
|
10 WR 64; 7 Jur NS 1128; 26 JP 148; 31 LJMC 72; 9 Cox CC 20
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
4
|
Rex v Hill
|
7 Cr App R 26
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
2
|
6 Exch 329-40
|
6 Exch 329-40
|
Court of Exchequer
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
6 Cr LJ 164
|
6 Cr LJ 164
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
R v Beeby
|
6 Cr App R 138
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
3
|
6 CLJ 273
|
6 CLJ 273
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
5 LT 329
|
5 LT 329
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
2
|
5 Lahore Law Journal 224
|
5 Lahore Law Journal 224
|
Lahore Law Journal
|
India - Punjab
|
|
|
|
1
|
5 Cr LJ 130
|
5 Cr LJ 130
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
4
|
R v Dickman
|
5 Cr App R 135; 26 TLR 640
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
LexisNexis
|
|
10
|
4 CWN 193
|
4 CWN 193
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
2
|
4 Australian Law Journal 207
|
4 Australian Law Journal 207
|
Australian Law Journal
|
Australia
|
|
Legal Online
|
|
5
|
3 Cr LJ 322
|
3 Cr LJ 322
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
2l WR 277
|
2l WR 277
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
2 IC 951
|
2 IC 951
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
1 Nev & MKB 530
|
1 Nev & MKB 530
|
King's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
1
|
1 CWN 681
|
1 CWN 681
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
1
|
1 Cal 207
|
1 Cal 207
|
|
United States - California
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|