Almada and Tirito Co, In re
|
[1888] UKLawRpCh 94; 38 Ch D 415
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
10 May 1888
|
CommonLII
|
|
27
|
Pilmer v The Duke Group Ltd (in liq)
|
[2001] HCA 31; (2001) 207 CLR 165; (2001) 180 ALR 249; (2001) 75 ALJR 1067; (2001) 38 ACSR 122; 19 ACLC 1; [2001] Aust Torts Reports 81-608; (2001) 49 ATR 324; (2001) 22 Leg Rep 27
|
High Court of Australia
|
Australia - Commonwealth
|
31 May 2001
|
AustLII
|
|
487
|
Domain Dynamics (Holdings) Ltd v Revenue & Customs
|
[2008] UKSPC SPC00701
|
United Kingdom Special Commissioners of Income Tax
|
United Kingdom
|
17 Jul 2008
|
BAILII
|
|
|
[1892] AC 137
|
[1892] AC 137
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1892
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
1
|
[1892] AC 136
|
[1892] AC 136
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1892
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
2
|
Pilmer v The Duke Group Ltd (in liq)
|
[2001] HCA 31; (2001) 207 CLR 165; (2001) 180 ALR 249; (2001) 75 ALJR 1067; (2001) 38 ACSR 122; 19 ACLC 1; [2001] Aust Torts Reports 81-608; (2001) 49 ATR 324; (2001) 22 Leg Rep 27
|
|
Australia
|
31 May 2001
|
AustLII
|
|
1
|
Newburgh and North Fife Railway Co v The North British Railway Co
|
[1913] ScotLR 929
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
17 Jul 1913
|
BAILII
|
|
|
Ooregum G01dmining Co v Roper
|
[1892] AC 145
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1892
|
LexisNexis / Westlaw
|
|
2
|
Ooregum Gold Mining Co of India v Roper; Wallroth v Roper
|
[1892] UKLawRpAC 11; [1892] AC 125
|
|
United Kingdom
|
14 Mar 1892
|
CommonLII
|
|
70
|