|
Shri Kirshna Gyanoday Sugar Ltd & Anr v Bihar
|
[2003] INSC 98
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
18 Feb 2003
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
|
|
Shri Kirshna Gyanoday Sugar Ltd & Anr v Bihar
|
[2003] INSC 102
|
Supreme Court of India
|
India
|
18 Feb 2003
|
LIIofIndia
|
|
|
|
Wheatley v Bower
|
[2001] WASCA 293
|
Supreme Court of Western Australia - Court of Appeal
|
Australia - Western Australia
|
24 Sep 2001
|
AustLII
|
|
27 
|
|
Dancker v Porter
|
[1862] VicWWRp 108; (1861-1862) 1 Wyatt & W (Eq) 313
|
Supreme Court of Victoria
|
Australia - Victoria
|
13 Nov 1862
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Stupart v Arrowsmith
|
[1856] EngR 112; 65 ER 613; (1855-1856) 3 Sm & G 176
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1855
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Holsgrave v Hedges
|
[1854] EngR 976; 3 Drew 74; 61 ER 830
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1854
|
CommonLII
|
|
3
|
|
Evans v Coventry
|
[1854] EngR 968; (1854) 3 Drew 75; 61 ER 831; 5 DM & G 9
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1854
|
CommonLII
|
|
3
|
|
Burbidge v Cotton
|
[1851] EngR 892; 64 ER 998; (1851) 5 De G & Sm 17
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1851
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Between Thomas Carlisle, on behalf of himself and all other the Shareholders in The South-Eastern Railway Co, except the Defendants to this suit, Plaintiff: and The South-Eastern Railway Co, James Macgregor, James Renshaw, Robert Browne, Henry Lewis Smale, John Bradshaw, The Right Honourable James Byng, John Charles Jack, Daniel Warren, William Gordon Thomson, Robert William Kennard, Charles Ironside; and Francis Curwen Smith, Defendants
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1850
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Between Robert H H Wilson (on behalf of himself and all other Shareholders in a certain Co, provisionally registered, called The London and Manchester Direct Independent Railway (Remington's Line), except such of the said Shareholders as are hereinafter named as Defendants hereto), Plaintiff; and The Honourable Leicester Stanhope (about twenty in number), Defendants
|
[1846] EngR 579
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1846
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Hills v Nash
|
[1845] EngR 1363
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1845
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Attwood v Small
|
[1838] UKHL J60; (1838) 6 Cl & F 232; 7 ER 684
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1838
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
John Attwood,-Appellant; Robert Small, James Henry Shears, Francis Baily, Michael Bland, James Burton, Thomas Frederick Colby, Stuart Donaldson, Charles Herring, Charles Kerr, Hart Logan, James Mackillop, John Morice, Charles Saville Onley, John Small, William Leathley, John Taylor, Henry James, and Richard Edwards,-Respondents
|
[1838] EngR 515; 7 ER 684; (1835-40) 6 Cl & F 232
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1835
|
CommonLII
|
|
5
|
|
Thomas Fenn, William Pratt, and Foster Reynolds, Plaintiffs, and Sir James Gibson Craig, Bart, John Anderson, Thomas Duncan, and Eagle Henderson, and the Honorable William Frazer, Major-General Sir Charles William Hallett, William Edmund Ferrers, and George Farren, Defendants
|
[1838] EngR 785; 160 ER 680; (1838) 3 Y & CEx 216
|
Court of Exchequer
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1838
|
CommonLII
|
|
2
|
|
Atwood v Small
|
[1838] UKHL J14
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1838
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
Blain v Agar
|
[1828] EngR 565; 57 ER 797; (1828) 2 Sim 289
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1828
|
CommonLII
|
|
2
|
