|
Grand Trunk Pacific Railway Co v British Columbia Express Co
|
(1916) 55 SCR 328
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
Canada
|
11 Dec 1916
|
Supreme Court of Canada
|
|
|
|
Attorney-General (on Relation of Pickfords Ltd) v Great Northern Railway Co
|
[1916] UKHL 412
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
21 Jul 1916
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
Sharpness New Docks and Gloucester and Birmingham Navigation Co v Attorney-General (at the Relation of the Worcester Corporation)
|
[1915] UKHL 918
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
19 Feb 1915
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
Attorney-General (At Relation of Worcester Corpn) v Sharpness New Docks and Gloucester and Birmingham Navigation Co
|
[1914] UKLawRpKQB 23; (1914) 3 KB 1
|
|
United Kingdom
|
30 Jan 1914
|
CommonLII
|
|
3
|
|
Hertfordshire County Council v Great Eastern Railway Co
|
[1908] UKLawRpKQB 178; [1909] 1 KB 368
|
|
United Kingdom
|
19 Dec 1908
|
CommonLII
|
|
1
|
|
Hertfordshire County Council v New River Co
|
[1904] UKLawRpCh 126; (1904) 2 Ch 513
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
16 Jul 1904
|
CommonLII
|
|
1
|
|
Hourigan v The Bendigo Tramways Co Ltd
|
[1896] VicLawRp 95; (1896) 22 VLR 273
|
|
Australia - Victoria
|
1 Oct 1896
|
AustLII
|
|
2
|
|
Washer v Bullitt County
|
110 US 558; 28 L Ed 249; 4 SCt 249
|
United States Supreme Court
|
United States
|
3 Mar 1884
|
WorldLII
|
|
6
|
|
Magistrates of Perth v Lord Kinnoull
|
[1872] ScotLR 9_555
|
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
28 Jun 1872
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
Nicholl v Allen
|
[1862] EngR 295; 1 B & S 916; 121 ER 954
|
Kings Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1862
|
CommonLII
|
|
3
|
|
Priestley, Clerk to the Undertakers of the navigation of the rivers Aire and Calder, acting under and by virtue of divers acts of parliament, and, amongst others, a certain act of parliament made and passed in the first year of the reign of His late Majesty King George the Fourth, intituled, "An act to enable the Undertakers of the navigation of the livers Aire and Calder, in the West Riding of the county of York, to make a navigable cut or canal, from" and out of the said navigation at Knottingley, to communicate with the river Ouze, near Goole, with two collateral branches, all in the said Riding, and to amend the acts relating to the said navigation," v Foulds
|
|
Court of Common Pleas
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1840
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Robinson v Nott
|
[1834] NSWSupC 24
|
Supreme Court of New South Wales
|
Australia - New South Wales
|
15 Mar 1834
|
AustLII
|
|
|
|
Mayor and Burgesses of Lyme Regis,-Plaintiffs (in Error); Henry Hoste Henley, Esq,-Defendant (in Error)
|
[1834] EngR 343
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1834
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Mayor and Burgesses of Lyme Regis,-Plaintiffs in Error; Henry Hoste Henley, Esq,-Defendant in Error
|
[1834] EngR 344; [1824-34] All ER 503; 6 ER 1180; (1834) 2 Cl & F 331
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1834
|
CommonLII
|
|
4
|
|
Mayor and Burgesses of Lyme Regis against-Henley, Esquire
|
[1832] EngR 296; 3 B & Ad 77; 110 ER 29
|
Kings Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1832
|
CommonLII
|
|
13 
|
|
Waterhouse v Keen
|
[1825] EngR 321; 4 B & C 200; 107 ER 1033; 10 East 66
|
Kings Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1825
|
CommonLII
|
|
19
|
|
R v The Inhabitants of Oxfordshire
|
[1825] EngR 255; 107 ER 1031; (1825) 4 B & C 194
|
Kings Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1825
|
CommonLII
|
|
5
|
|
R v Kerrison
|
[1815] EngR 518; 3 M & S 526; 105 ER 708; 2 B & Ald 646
|
King's Bench
|
United Kingdom - Scotland
|
circa 1815
|
CommonLII
|
|
26
|
|
R v The Inhabitants of the Parts of Lindsey in the County of Loncoln
|
[1811] EngR 412; 14 East 317; 104 ER 623
|
King's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1811
|
CommonLII
|
|
21
|
