|
Parkhurst v Lowten
|
[1819] EngR 598; (1818) 2 Swanst 194; 36 ER 589
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1818
|
CommonLII
|
|
 18 
|
|
Howel versus Price, et e con'
|
[1715] EngR 21; 1 PWms 291; 24 ER 394
|
King's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1715
|
CommonLII
|
|
6
|
|
Amesbury v Brown
|
[1750] EngR 117; 27 ER 1152; (1750) 1 Ves Sen 477
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1750
|
CommonLII
|
|
3
|
|
Haslewood v Pope
|
[1734] EngR 35; 24 ER 1084; (1734) 3 PWms 322
|
King's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1734
|
CommonLII
|
|
1
|
|
Power v Power [1858] IELawRpEq 88
|
(1857-1859) 8 ICh R 340
|
Court of Chancery
|
Republic of Ireland
|
7 Nov 1858
|
BAILII
|
|
|
|
Henry Seymour Moore Vandeleur, Esq, Anne Frances Vandeleur, Spinster, and Alice Stewart, otherwise Vandeleur, Widow, the younger children of the Right Hon John Ormsby Vandeleur, deceased,-Appellants; Crofton Moore Vandeleur, Esq the eldest son of said John Ormsby Vandeleur, and the Right Hon Thomas Burton Vandeleur, one of the Judges of His Majesty's Court of King's Bench in Ireland, and Crofton Fitz Gerald, Esq, Executors of the last will and testament of the said John Ormsby Vandeleur,-Respondents
|
|
House of Lords
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1835
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Between Sir Ralph Noel, Baronet, and the Honourable Lady Judith his Wife, The Honourable Nathaniel, Curzon, and The Right Hon Robert Sewallis Shirley, Commonly Called Lord Viscount Tamworth, and the Right Honourable Suphia Caroline, Viscountess Tamworth, his Wife, Defendants in the suit in the Court of Exchequer-Appellants; and The Reverend Thomas Noel and Catherine his Wife, Vincent Hilton Biscoe and Anna Catharina his Wife, Plaintiffs in the Exchequer; Morton Lord Henley, Sir James Bland Burges, Thomas Noel, Robert Ralph Noel, Sophia Ann Noel Frances Noel, Charles Noel, Edward Henry Noel, Robert Tritton and Mary his Wife, clement Strong and Catherine Bridget his Wife, Sophia Biscoe, Robert Biscoe Harriet Susannah Biscoe, Elizabeth Biscoe Frederick Biscoe, William Archibald Biscoe, Frances Agnata Biscoe, Thomas Linwood Strong, Thomas William Blomefield, Robert Harry Inglis, John Tritton, and Robert Barclay, Defendants in the Excchequer-Respondents
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1823
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Cope contra Cope
|
[1795] EngR 888; 91 ER 389; (1795) 2 Salk 449
|
King's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1795
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Duke of Ancaster v Mayer
|
[1785] EngR 157
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1785
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Cavendish v Cavendish
|
[1785] EngR 159
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1785
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Astley v Powis
|
[1750] EngR 120; 27 ER 1156; (1750) 1 Ves Sen 483
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1750
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Hardcastle and Slater; and cross Bill by Owners and Occupiers of Estates in the Rectory or Parish of Coverham, Yorkshire, on behalf of themselves v Hardcastle
|
[1745] EngR 60; 27 ER 23; [1745] Amb 41
|
Court of Chancery
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1745
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Hervey versus Aston
|
[1736] EngR 20
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1736
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
Stapleton versus Colvile
|
[1736] EngR 78
|
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1736
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
|
London Assurance v East-India Co
|
[1734] EngR 45; 24 ER 1086; (1734) 3 PWms 326
|
King's Bench
|
United Kingdom
|
circa 1734
|
CommonLII
|
|
|
