LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback Law Cite

Dawes versus Ferrers     9

Cases Referring to this Case

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction †	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
Loftus v Stoney [1867] IELawRpEq 27	(1864-1866) 17 ICh R 178	Court of Chancery	Republic of Ireland	16 Feb 1867	BAILII
Doe on the Demise of William Angell v Benedict John Angell Angell	[1846] EngR 385; (1846) 9 QB 328; 115 ER 1299		United Kingdom	circa 1846	CommonLII		6
Courtenay v Williams	[1844] EngR 763; 3 Hare 539; 15 LJCh 204; 67 ER 494	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	circa 1844	CommonLII		31
Doe on the Demise of Isaac Winter v Perratt Doeon The Several demises of Catherine Viney, Thomas Viney, and Thomas Green-Slade v Perratt Goodtitle on The Several Demises of John Slade and John Staines Webb v Perratt	[1826] EngR 154; 5 B & C 48; 108 ER 19	Kings Bench	United Kingdom	circa 1826	CommonLII		5
Meadows v Tanner	[1820] EngR 247; 5 Madd 34; 56 ER 807	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	circa 1820	CommonLII		3
Ranking v Barnard	[1820] EngR 233; 5 Madd 32; 56 ER 806	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	circa 1820	CommonLII		5
Simonds versus Cudmore	[1795] EngR 3103; 3 Salk 336; 91 ER 857	King's Bench	United Kingdom	circa 1795	CommonLII		11
Lee Versus Brace	[1795] EngR 2371; 91 ER 858; (1795) 3 Salk 337	King's Bench	United Kingdom	circa 1795	CommonLII
Lord Ossulston 858 TAIL 3 s-, 391 base fee;and that becomes merged in the other fee, and lets in all the incumbraI~ces of the ancestor; which has f r e ~ u e ~ ihappeIer~iu ~ractice,from such a person being t l ~ ill advised to levy a fine instead of $~ifferinga re~ovary 5 Term Bep 109, Eoe v ~ u ~ Mr Cruise~makes a simihr obsarvation in his treatise on ~ecoveries,p 156 2 Lono ~ S S U ~ , S T ~CASE N ' ~ [Mieh, 7 Arinrtl ] [See S C, sub nom, Fwd v 0 ~ ~ ~ 611~ ~ ~189			United Kingdom		CommonLII

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name	Citation(s)	Court	Jurisdiction †	Date	Full Text		Citation Index
Samuel Newcomen, and Mary his wife, versus Edward Barkham, and Sir William Massenburgh & Al'; Edward Barkham versus Newcomen & Ux', Sir William Massenburgh, Dimock Walpool and John Walpool	[1716] EngR 45; 2 Vern 729; 23 ER 1078; 1 Eq Ab 215	Court of Chancery	United Kingdom	circa 1716	CommonLII		19
Lord Ossulston 858 TAIL 3 s-, 391 base fee;and that becomes merged in the other fee, and lets in all the incumbraI~ces of the ancestor; which has f r e ~ u e ~ ihappeIer~iu ~ractice,from such a person being t l ~ ill advised to levy a fine instead of $~ifferinga re~ovary 5 Term Bep 109, Eoe v ~ u ~ Mr Cruise~makes a simihr obsarvation in his treatise on ~ecoveries,p 156 2 Lono ~ S S U ~ , S T ~CASE N ' ~ [Mieh, 7 Arinrtl ] [See S C, sub nom, Fwd v 0 ~ ~ ~ 611~ ~ ~189			United Kingdom		CommonLII
2 P SA3	2 P SA3						2